Zalkind Duncan & Bernstein LLP: Critical Legal Risks in Terms & Conditions Exposed | Erayaha

## When Legal Protection Falls Short: Zalkind Duncan & Bernstein LLP’s Terms Under the Microscope

Imagine a scenario where a single ambiguous clause in your terms could expose your firm to over $1 million in damages or regulatory fines. Our analysis of Zalkind Duncan & Bernstein LLP’s Terms & Conditions reveals several critical gaps that could result in substantial financial and reputational harm. Here’s what every legal professional should know about these risks—and how to fix them.

1. Absence of Limitation of Liability: A Million-Dollar Exposure One of the most glaring omissions is the lack of a limitation of liability clause. Without this safeguard, the firm could be exposed to unlimited damages in the event of a client dispute or data breach. In similar cases, law firms have faced litigation costs exceeding $500,000 and settlements reaching $2 million. This is a standard protection in professional services agreements and its absence is a significant risk.

Legal Analysis

critical Risk

Removed

Added

[No limitationLimitation of Liability: To the fullest extent permitted by law, Zalkind Duncan & Bernstein LLP’s liability clause present infor any claim arising out of or relating to the termsprovision of legal services shall be limited to the total fees paid by the client for such services, except in cases of gross negligence or willful misconduct.]

Legal Explanation

Including a limitation of liability clause is a standard risk management practice that caps potential damages, making exposure predictable and insurable. Its absence leaves the firm vulnerable to unlimited claims, which could be financially devastating.

2. Vague Data Usage and Privacy Commitments: Regulatory Red Flags The terms lack any specific language regarding how client or user data is collected, stored, or used. This exposes the firm to potential violations of GDPR, CCPA, and state privacy laws, where fines can reach up to €20 million or 4% of annual revenue. Clear, compliant data usage terms are essential to avoid regulatory action and client mistrust.

Legal Analysis

high Risk

Removed

Added

[No dataData Privacy: Zalkind Duncan & Bernstein LLP will collect, use, and store personal information only as necessary to provide legal services, in compliance with applicable privacy orlaws including GDPR and CCPA. Personal data usage clause present in the termswill not be shared with third parties without explicit consent, except as required by law.]

Legal Explanation

The revised clause provides specific commitments to data privacy and regulatory compliance, reducing the risk of fines and client disputes. It also builds client trust by clarifying data handling practices.

3. Missing Governing Law and Jurisdiction Clause: Increased Litigation Risk There is no clause specifying which state’s laws govern disputes or where legal actions must be brought. This omission can lead to costly jurisdictional battles and forum shopping, increasing litigation costs by tens of thousands of dollars per case. A clear governing law clause is a foundational element of enforceable contracts.

Legal Analysis

high Risk

Removed

Added

[No governing law or jurisdiction clause presentGoverning Law: These terms and any disputes arising hereunder shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the termslaws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.] Any legal action shall be brought exclusively in the state or federal courts located in Boston, Massachusetts.

Legal Explanation

A governing law and jurisdiction clause prevents forum shopping and ensures predictability in dispute resolution, reducing litigation costs and uncertainty.

4. No Explicit Termination Rights or Procedures: Unclear Client Exit Pathways The terms do not address how either party may terminate the engagement or the consequences of termination. This can result in disputes over fees, unfinished work, or ongoing obligations, potentially leading to protracted litigation or arbitration. Well-defined termination provisions reduce uncertainty and protect both parties.

Legal Analysis

medium Risk

Removed

Added

[NoTermination: Either party may terminate the engagement upon written notice. Upon termination clause present in, the termsclient shall pay for all services rendered and expenses incurred up to the date of termination.] The firm will provide all client files and documents upon request, subject to applicable law.

Legal Explanation

A clear termination clause defines exit rights and obligations, reducing the risk of fee disputes and litigation over unfinished work. It protects both parties and supports enforceability.

---

Key Takeaways & Business Impact Our examination shows that these omissions and ambiguities could expose Zalkind Duncan & Bernstein LLP to substantial financial losses, regulatory penalties, and reputational harm. Proactively redlining and updating these terms is essential for robust legal protection and client trust.

Are your terms exposing your firm to preventable risk? What would a regulatory audit reveal about your contracts? How much could a single oversight cost your business?

---

This analysis is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For actual legal guidance, consult with a licensed attorney. This assessment is based on publicly available information and professional legal analysis. See erayaha.ai’s terms of service for liability limitations.