The Wright Institute’s Terms & Conditions: Top Legal Risks and Redline Solutions | Erayaha

## When Privacy Gaps Can Cost Millions: The Wright Institute’s T&C Under the Lens

When we examined The Wright Institute’s Terms & Conditions, our analysis revealed several legal and logical vulnerabilities that could expose the institution to substantial regulatory fines and litigation costs. For example, under GDPR, privacy violations can result in penalties up to €20 million or 4% of annual revenue. Below, we highlight four key issues and provide actionable redlines to strengthen enforceability and compliance.

1. Ambiguous Data Sharing with Third Parties The clause allowing user information to be shared with third parties “where we believe that doing so is necessary or appropriate” is overly broad and lacks clear limitations. This ambiguity could result in non-compliance with GDPR and CCPA, exposing the Institute to regulatory fines and class action lawsuits.

Legal Analysis

high Risk

Removed

Added

We may also providewill only disclose your personal information to third parties in circumstances where we believe that doing so is necessary or appropriate to: satisfy anywhen required by applicable law, regulation, legal process or governmental request; detect, prevent or otherwise address fraudwith your explicit consent, security or technical issues; or protect the rights, property or safety of us, ourand will provide notice to users or otherswhenever feasible, except where prohibited by law.

Legal Explanation

The original clause is overly broad and subjective, lacking clear legal thresholds and user notification requirements. The revision aligns with GDPR/CCPA by limiting disclosures to legal obligations or explicit consent, reducing regulatory risk.

2. Insufficient User Consent for Cookies and Tracking The T&C states that cookies are used and that third-party cookies may be set, but does not require explicit user consent or provide a mechanism for users to manage preferences. This omission is a direct compliance gap under GDPR and CCPA, risking fines and reputational damage.

Legal Analysis

high Risk

Removed

Added

Cookies are small files that are stored on your computer (unless you block them). We use cookies to understand and savesimilar technologies only with your preferences for future visitsexplicit consent, and compile aggregate data about site traffic and site interaction so that we can offer better site experiences and tools inprovide you with the futureability to manage your cookie preferences at any time. We may contract with thirdThird-party service providers to assist us cookies will not be set without your prior opt-in better understanding our site visitorsconsent, in accordance with GDPR and CCPA requirements.

Legal Explanation

The original clause does not require user consent for cookies or provide a mechanism for managing preferences, violating GDPR/CCPA. The revision ensures explicit consent and user control, reducing regulatory exposure.

3. Lack of Data Retention and Deletion Policy While the policy mentions temporary retention of server logs, it does not specify how long other personal data is retained or provide users with a right to request deletion. This omission is a significant compliance risk under GDPR Article 17 (Right to Erasure) and CCPA.

Legal Analysis

medium Risk

Removed

Added

WebAll personal data, including web server logs are retained on a temporary basis and thenuser submissions, will be retained only for as long as necessary to fulfill the purposes outlined in this policy, after which it will be securely deleted from our systems. Users may request deletion of their personal data at any time, in accordance with GDPR Article 17 and CCPA.

Legal Explanation

The original clause only addresses server logs and omits broader data retention and deletion rights. The revision provides a clear retention schedule and user right to erasure, ensuring regulatory compliance.

4. Overbroad Disclaimer of Liability for Third-Party Links The T&C disclaims all responsibility for third-party websites, but fails to address liability for damages arising from links provided by the Institute. Courts have found such blanket disclaimers unenforceable, especially if users are harmed by malicious or misleading links.

Legal Analysis

medium Risk

Removed

Added

While Wi.edu does not control third-party websites and is, we will make reasonable efforts to ensure that links provided on our site do not responsible for the contents of any linked-direct users to, third-party websites malicious or any hyperlink in a linked-to websitefraudulent content. We are not responsibledisclaim liability for the privacy practices or the content of third-party websitescontent except where we have been negligent in providing or maintaining such links.

Legal Explanation

Blanket disclaimers of all liability for third-party links are often unenforceable, especially if negligence is involved. The revision introduces a reasonableness standard, aligning with legal precedent and reducing litigation risk.

Conclusion: Proactive Legal Protection is Essential Our analysis shows that The Wright Institute’s current terms expose the institution to significant regulatory and financial risks, including potential GDPR/CCPA fines, litigation costs, and reputational harm. Proactive redlining and regular legal review can mitigate these exposures and ensure ongoing compliance.

Are your organization’s terms keeping pace with evolving privacy regulations?
What would a major data breach or regulatory investigation cost your institution?
How often do you review your legal framework for enforceability and compliance?

This analysis is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For actual legal guidance, consult with a licensed attorney. This assessment is based on publicly available information and professional legal analysis. See erayaha.ai’s terms of service for liability limitations.