Wisconsin Broadcasters Association: Top Legal Risks in Terms & Conditions (2024 Analysis) | Erayaha

## When Legal Loopholes Lead to Real Costs: Analyzing Wisconsin Broadcasters Association’s Terms & Conditions

Imagine a scenario where an ambiguous liability clause or a missing consumer protection leads to a six-figure lawsuit, or where non-compliance with privacy regulations triggers fines up to $100,000. Our analysis of the Wisconsin Broadcasters Association’s (WBA) Terms & Conditions reveals several critical legal and logical risks that could expose the organization to substantial financial and reputational damage.

1. Overbroad Limitation of Liability: Unenforceable and Risky WBA’s limitation of liability clause attempts to exclude nearly all forms of damages, including those arising from negligence or gross misconduct. Courts routinely strike down such overbroad exclusions, especially where consumer protection laws apply. This exposes WBA to unpredictable litigation costs and potential damages exceeding $250,000 per incident, based on industry averages for similar disputes.

Legal Analysis

critical Risk

Removed

Added

InExcept to the extent prohibited by applicable law, in no event shall WBA, its directors, employees, partners, agents, suppliers, or affiliates, be liable for any indirect, incidental, special, consequential or punitive damages, including without limitation, lossexcept in cases of profitsgross negligence, datawillful misconduct, use, goodwill, or other intangible losses, resulting fromwhere liability cannot be excluded by law (a) your access to or use of or inability to access or use the Site; (b) any conduct or content of any third party on the Site; (c) any content obtained from the Site; and (d) unauthorized access, use or alteration of your transmissions or content, whether based on warranty, contract, tort (including negligence) or any other legal theory, whether orbut not WBA has been informed of the possibility of such damage, and even if a remedy set forth herein is foundlimited to have failed of its essential purposeconsumer protection statutes).

Legal Explanation

The original clause attempts to exclude all liability, including for gross negligence or statutory violations, which courts routinely find unenforceable. The revision aligns with legal standards, preserving enforceability and reducing the risk of the entire clause being struck down.

2. Unilateral Amendment Without Notice: Compliance and Enforceability Risks The Terms allow WBA to update terms or the site at any time, without any obligation to notify users. This practice is increasingly scrutinized under consumer protection statutes and can render changes unenforceable, leading to regulatory action or class-action exposure. The FTC and state AGs have penalized similar practices with fines ranging from $10,000 to $75,000.

Legal Analysis

high Risk

Removed

Added

From time to time WBA may update this Site and/or these Terms without notice. Your use of this Site constitutes your agreementfrom time to time. Material changes to these Terms will be communicated to users via email or prominent notice on the Site at least 15 days prior to taking effect. You should checkContinued use of the Site forafter such changes frequentlynotice constitutes acceptance of the revised Terms.

Legal Explanation

Unilateral amendment without notice is often unenforceable and may violate consumer protection laws. The revision ensures users are informed of material changes, supporting enforceability and regulatory compliance.

3. Incomplete Privacy Reference: Insufficient User Protection The Terms merely reference a Privacy Policy without summarizing user rights or data handling practices. This lack of specificity can violate state privacy laws (e.g., CCPA, Wisconsin statutes) and exposes WBA to regulatory fines and private lawsuits, with statutory damages of up to $7,500 per violation under CCPA.

Legal Analysis

high Risk

Removed

Added

Any information that you provide to WBA is subject to our Privacy Policy, which governs WBA’s collection and useoutlines the categories of your informationdata collected, purposes of use, user rights, and data protection measures, in accordance with applicable privacy laws such as CCPA and Wisconsin statutes.

Legal Explanation

The original clause lacks specificity regarding user rights and data practices, risking non-compliance with privacy regulations. The revision clarifies obligations and supports transparency, reducing regulatory risk.

4. Indemnification Clause: Unreasonable Burden on Users The indemnification provision requires users to defend WBA for any claims arising from site use, regardless of fault or proportionality. Courts often reject such one-sided indemnity clauses, potentially invalidating the provision and leaving WBA unprotected in third-party disputes.

Legal Analysis

medium Risk

Removed

Added

You agree to defend, indemnify, and hold WBA harmless, as well as its licensee(s) and licensor(s), and its or their employees, contractors, agents, officers and directors, from and against any and all claims, damages, obligations, losses, liabilities, costs or debt, and expenses (including but not limited to attorney’s fees), resulting from or arising out of (a)solely from your use and access of the Site, by youwillful misconduct or any person using your account and password, or (b) amaterial breach of these Terms, provided that WBA promptly notifies you of any such claim and allows you to participate in the defense.

Legal Explanation

The original clause imposes an unreasonable and potentially unenforceable burden on users, including liability for actions beyond their control. The revision limits indemnity to user fault and ensures procedural fairness, improving enforceability.

---

Key Takeaways and Business Implications Our examination shows that ambiguous or overreaching clauses can lead to costly litigation, regulatory penalties, and reputational harm. Proactive redlining and legal review are essential to ensure enforceability and compliance, protecting both the organization and its users.

Are your contracts exposing your organization to unnecessary risk? How often do you review your terms for compliance with evolving regulations? What would a six-figure lawsuit mean for your bottom line?

---

This analysis is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For actual legal guidance, consult with a licensed attorney. This assessment is based on publicly available information and professional legal analysis. See erayaha.ai’s terms of service for liability limitations.