Ven Johnson Law logo
Ven Johnson Law

Ven Johnson Law: Key Legal Risks in Terms & Conditions and How to Fix Them

Our analysis of Ven Johnson Law's Terms & Conditions reveals critical legal risks, including privacy, compliance, and liability loopholes. Discover actionable redlines to strengthen enforceability.

## When Legal Language Leaves Millions at Risk: Ven Johnson Law T&C Analysis

Imagine a scenario where a single ambiguous clause in your terms exposes your firm to GDPR fines of up to €20 million, or where missing compliance language leads to costly class action lawsuits. Our analysis of Ven Johnson Law’s Terms & Conditions reveals several high-impact legal risks that could result in significant financial and reputational harm if left unaddressed.

1. Privacy Consent Ambiguity Could Trigger Regulatory Fines Ven Johnson Law’s T&C currently lacks explicit, informed consent language for collecting and processing personal data. This exposes the firm to potential GDPR and CCPA violations, where fines can reach up to 4% of annual revenue or $7,500 per violation under CCPA. The absence of clear consent mechanisms is a critical compliance gap.

Legal Analysis
high Risk
Removed
Added
By providing your phone number and other personal information, you agreeexpressly consent to receive text messages from Ven Johnson Lawthe collection, PLC. Messageuse, and processing of your personal data rates may applyas described herein, in accordance with applicable privacy laws including the GDPR and CCPA. Message frequency variesYou have the right to withdraw your consent at any time.

Legal Explanation

The original clause does not specify the scope of data collection, processing, or the legal basis for consent, risking non-compliance with major privacy regulations. The revision clarifies consent and aligns with regulatory requirements for transparency and user rights.

2. Unclear Data Usage and Retention Policy Increases Litigation Risk The T&C does not specify how long personal data is retained or the purposes for which it is used. This omission can lead to regulatory scrutiny and class action exposure, as seen in recent cases where unclear data practices resulted in multimillion-dollar settlements.

Legal Analysis
high Risk
Removed
Added
By providing your phone number, you agreePersonal information provided will be used solely for the purposes of communication regarding legal services and will be retained only as long as necessary to receive text messages from Ven Johnson Lawfulfill these purposes, PLC. Message andin compliance with applicable data rates may applyretention laws. Message frequency varies.

Legal Explanation

The original clause lacks specificity on data usage and retention, which is required by privacy laws to inform users how their data will be used and for how long. The revision provides clarity and compliance, reducing litigation risk.

3. Missing Limitation of Liability Clause Exposes to Unlimited Damages Without a limitation of liability clause, Ven Johnson Law could face uncapped damages in the event of a breach or dispute. Industry standards typically cap liability to the amount paid or a fixed sum, reducing exposure to catastrophic losses. The absence of this clause could mean multi-million dollar verdicts are not contractually limited.

Legal Analysis
critical Risk
Removed
Added
[No limitation ofTo the fullest extent permitted by law, Ven Johnson Law, PLC’s liability clause present infor any claims arising out of or related to the T&Cuse of this website or its services shall be limited to the amount paid, if any, by the user for such services, or $1,000, whichever is greater.] In no event shall Ven Johnson Law, PLC be liable for indirect, incidental, or consequential damages.

Legal Explanation

Absence of a limitation of liability clause exposes the firm to uncapped damages. The revision introduces a standard cap, aligning with industry best practices and reducing the risk of catastrophic financial loss.

4. No Governing Law or Jurisdiction Clause Creates Legal Uncertainty The T&C fails to specify which state’s laws govern disputes or where claims must be brought. This omission can lead to forum shopping, increased litigation costs, and unpredictable outcomes—especially problematic for a firm operating across state lines.

Legal Analysis
medium Risk
Removed
Added
[No governing law or jurisdiction clause presentThese Terms & Conditions shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the T&Claws of the State of Michigan.] Any disputes arising under these Terms shall be resolved exclusively in the state or federal courts located in Wayne County, Michigan.

Legal Explanation

The absence of a governing law and jurisdiction clause creates uncertainty and increases litigation costs. The revision provides predictability and reduces the risk of forum shopping.

---

Conclusion: Proactive Redlines for Legal Protection Our examination shows that addressing these four issues—privacy consent, data usage, liability limitation, and governing law—can dramatically reduce regulatory risk, litigation exposure, and financial uncertainty. Proactive contract review is essential for any firm seeking to avoid preventable losses and regulatory penalties.

  • How often does your organization audit its legal documents for enforceability gaps?
  • What would a multi-million dollar regulatory fine mean for your business continuity?
  • Are your current contracts defensible in court and compliant with evolving laws?

This analysis is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For actual legal guidance, consult with a licensed attorney. This assessment is based on publicly available information and professional legal analysis. See erayaha.ai’s terms of service for liability limitations.