Tofu logo
Tofu

Tofu’s Terms & Conditions: Uncovering Legal Risks and Compliance Gaps

Our analysis of Tofu’s Terms & Conditions reveals critical legal risks, including privacy ambiguities and compliance gaps, with potential for significant regulatory fines. Discover actionable solutions.

## Unveiling Hidden Legal Risks in Tofu’s Terms & Conditions

When we examined Tofu’s Terms & Conditions, our legal analysis uncovered several high-impact risks that could expose the company to regulatory fines, litigation, and reputational harm. For SaaS providers, even a single compliance gap can result in fines exceeding $20 million under GDPR or costly class-action lawsuits in the US. Our findings highlight the importance of precise, enforceable language and proactive legal safeguards.

1. Ambiguous Data Collection Purposes: A GDPR Minefield Tofu’s policy states, "We may collect and use your personal information as we deem necessary for business purposes." This broad language fails to specify lawful bases for data processing, risking non-compliance with GDPR Article 5 and CCPA requirements. The financial impact? GDPR fines can reach €20 million or 4% of annual global turnover, while US class actions for privacy violations routinely settle for millions.

Legal Analysis
high Risk
Removed
Added
We may collect and use your personal information as we deem necessarysolely for businessthe specific purposes outlined in this section, in accordance with applicable privacy laws including GDPR and CCPA, and only with appropriate legal basis such as consent or legitimate business interest.

Legal Explanation

The original clause is overly broad and fails to meet privacy law requirements for specific, lawful purposes. The revision provides clear limitations, regulatory compliance, and establishes proper legal basis for data processing.

2. Vague Data Sharing Practices: Exposure to Third-Party Liability The clause, "We may share your information with third parties," lacks specificity regarding categories of recipients, purposes, and safeguards. Without clear restrictions, Tofu risks breaching privacy laws and incurring joint liability for third-party misuse. Regulatory enforcement actions for improper data sharing have resulted in multi-million dollar penalties and mandatory remediation programs.

Legal Analysis
high Risk
Removed
Added
We may share your information only with third parties as specifically identified in this policy, for purposes expressly stated herein, and subject to appropriate contractual safeguards to ensure compliance with applicable privacy laws.

Legal Explanation

The original clause is vague and does not specify categories of recipients, purposes, or safeguards, exposing the company to joint liability and regulatory penalties. The revision introduces specificity and compliance requirements.

3. Insufficient Children’s Privacy Protections: COPPA and Global Risk Tofu’s brief reference to children’s privacy omits age verification and parental consent mechanisms, exposing the company to COPPA violations in the US and similar global laws. COPPA penalties can reach $43,280 per violation, and enforcement actions often trigger costly remediation and reputational damage.

Legal Analysis
high Risk
Removed
Added
1.4 - Children’s Privacy: We do not knowingly collect personal information from children under the age of 13. If we become aware that we have collected such information without verified parental consent, we will promptly delete it and implement measures to prevent future collection. Users under 13 are required to obtain parental consent before using our services.

Legal Explanation

The original clause lacks detail on age verification and parental consent, exposing the company to COPPA and international children’s privacy law violations. The revision adds enforceable protections and compliance mechanisms.

4. Unilateral Policy Changes: Enforceability and Consumer Protection The clause, "We may change our Privacy Policy at any time," allows unilateral changes without notice or consent. Such provisions are often unenforceable under consumer protection laws (e.g., California’s BPC § 17200) and can trigger regulatory scrutiny. Failure to notify users of material changes may invalidate consent and increase litigation risk.

Legal Analysis
medium Risk
Removed
Added
We may changeupdate our Privacy Policy at anyfrom time to time. Material changes will be communicated to users in advance, and continued use of the service after such notice constitutes acceptance of the revised policy. Where required by law, we will obtain renewed consent.

Legal Explanation

Unilateral change clauses are often unenforceable and can invalidate user consent. The revision ensures notice, transparency, and compliance with consumer protection laws.

Conclusion: Proactive Legal Safeguards Are Essential Our analysis reveals that Tofu’s current Terms & Conditions contain critical legal and logical gaps that could result in regulatory fines, litigation costs, and loss of user trust. Addressing these issues with precise, compliant language is not just best practice—it’s essential risk management.

Are your contracts exposing your business to hidden liabilities? What would a regulatory audit reveal about your compliance posture? How can you proactively strengthen your legal framework before issues arise?

This analysis is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For actual legal guidance, consult with a licensed attorney. This assessment is based on publicly available information and professional legal analysis. See erayaha.ai’s terms of service for liability limitations.