•
Public Affairs Council logo
Public Affairs Council

Public Affairs Council Terms & Conditions: Top Legal Risks and Enforceability Gaps Revealed

Our expert review of Public Affairs Council's Terms & Conditions uncovers critical legal risks, including liability limits, data handling, and IP ambiguities. See actionable redlines for compliance.

## When Legal Loopholes Cost Millions: Public Affairs Council T&C Case Study

Imagine a scenario where a single ambiguous clause in your website’s terms could expose your organization to regulatory fines exceeding $2 million, or where a vague indemnity provision leads to six-figure litigation costs. Our analysis of Public Affairs Council’s Terms & Conditions reveals several such high-impact legal and logical risks—each with the potential to undermine enforceability, regulatory compliance, and financial stability.

1. Unilateral Amendment Rights: Compliance and Enforceability at Risk The Terms grant the Association broad discretion to revise terms at any time, with continued use deemed acceptance. This approach is increasingly scrutinized under consumer protection laws (e.g., FTC, EU Directive 93/13/EEC) and may be deemed unenforceable, especially if users are not provided with effective notice or an opportunity to reject changes. Failure here can result in class action exposure and regulatory penalties, with settlements in similar cases reaching $500,000+.

Legal Analysis
high Risk
Removed
Added
The Association reserves the right, at its discretion, tomay change, modify, add, or remove all or portions of these Terms of Use by providing users with at any timeleast 30 days’ prior written notice via email or prominent website notice. Your continuedContinued use of this website will indicateafter the effective date constitutes acceptance by you of such rules, changes or modifications. Users who do not agree to the revised terms may terminate their use without penalty.

Legal Explanation

The original clause grants unilateral amendment rights without notice or opt-out, which is likely unenforceable under consumer protection laws and exposes the Association to class action risk. The revision ensures effective notice and a meaningful opportunity to reject changes, aligning with regulatory standards and improving enforceability.

2. Overbroad License on User Submissions: IP and Confidentiality Hazards The T&C grant the Association an “unlimited, assignable, sub-licenseable, perpetual” license to all user submissions, with no carve-outs for confidential or proprietary information. This exposes the Association to claims under trade secret laws and could trigger statutory damages of up to $150,000 per work under the DMCA for copyright misuse.

Legal Analysis
high Risk
Removed
Added
You must grantBy submitting content, and you actually grant by agreeing to these Terms of Use,the Association a non-exclusive, irrevocable, worldwide, perpetual, unlimited, assignable, sub-licenseable, fully paid up, and royalty-free rightlicense to the Association to copyuse, prepare derivative works ofreproduce, improve, distribute, publish, remove, retain, add, and usedisplay your submission solely as necessary for the operation and commercializepromotion of the website, in any way now knownexcept for confidential or in the future discoveredproprietary information, anything that you submit to the Association,which will not be used or disclosed without any furtheryour explicit consent, notice and/or compensation to you or any third parties.

Legal Explanation

The original clause is overbroad and fails to exclude confidential or proprietary information, creating exposure to IP and trade secret claims. The revision narrows the license scope and adds explicit protection for confidential submissions, reducing risk of statutory damages and user disputes.

3. Limitation of Liability: Unconscionability and Regulatory Non-Compliance The limitation of liability clause seeks to cap damages at $100, regardless of the nature or cause of loss. Such a low cap is likely to be found unconscionable and unenforceable in many jurisdictions, especially in cases involving gross negligence, data breaches, or statutory violations. Regulatory fines for data breaches (e.g., under GDPR) can reach €20 million or 4% of annual global turnover, far exceeding the stated cap.

Legal Analysis
critical Risk
Removed
Added
If, notwithstanding the foregoing, the Association is found liable in any legal proceeding, its aggregate liability shall not exceed the greater of (a) US$10010,000 or (b) the total amount paid by the user in the preceding 12 months, except in cases of gross negligence, willful misconduct, data breaches, or violations of law, for which no limitation shall apply.00.

Legal Explanation

A $100 liability cap is likely unconscionable and unenforceable, especially for statutory, data breach, or gross negligence claims. The revision provides a commercially reasonable cap and carve-outs for non-waivable liabilities, aligning with legal standards and reducing the risk of invalidation.

4. Cardholder Data Storage: Incomplete PCI-DSS Compliance Language While the T&C reference PCI SSC standards, they lack explicit commitments to full PCI-DSS compliance, breach notification, or user rights regarding stored payment data. This gap could result in non-compliance penalties of $5,000–$100,000 per month from card networks, and exposes the Association to regulatory investigations and class actions.

Legal Analysis
high Risk
Removed
Added
Once a payment is processed,All cardholder data may, in some cases,will be stored as permitted by the PCI Security Standards Council (PCI SSC). That data may include primary account numbercollected, cardholder nameprocessed, service code and expiration date, although the full primary account number will never be stored strictly in accordance with cardholder name and expiration datethe latest PCI-DSS requirements. TheIn the event of a data will be rendered unreadable, stored securely and never stored in online data storage services. Storedbreach involving cardholder data, affected users will not be used for additional purchases unless otherwise instructednotified without undue delay as required by applicable law. StoredUsers have the right to request deletion of their cardholder data will be reviewed quarterly and unnecessary data purgedat any time. We will never store sensitive authentication data.

Legal Explanation

The original clause references PCI SSC but omits explicit PCI-DSS compliance, breach notification, and user rights. The revision clarifies compliance obligations, adds breach notification, and provides user control, reducing regulatory and litigation risk.

---

Conclusion: Proactive Redlining for Legal Resilience Our examination shows that even well-drafted terms can harbor critical gaps with substantial financial and regulatory consequences. Addressing these issues proactively not only strengthens enforceability but also protects against avoidable losses and reputational harm.

  • How often do you audit your digital contracts for regulatory and business risk?
  • Are your limitation of liability and data protection clauses defensible in court?
  • What would a single compliance failure cost your organization?

This analysis is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For actual legal guidance, consult with a licensed attorney. This assessment is based on publicly available information and professional legal analysis. See erayaha.ai’s terms of service for liability limitations.