Pancentric Digital’s Privacy Policy: Key Legal Risks and Enforceability Gaps Revealed | Erayaha

## When We Examined Pancentric Digital’s Privacy Policy: Critical Legal Risks Uncovered

Imagine facing a GDPR fine of up to €20 million or 4% of annual turnover—simply due to unclear consent language or insufficient data protection measures. Our analysis of Pancentric Digital’s Privacy Policy reveals several high-impact legal and logical risks that could expose the company to regulatory penalties, litigation, and reputational damage. Below, we detail the four most significant issues and present actionable redlines to strengthen enforceability and compliance.

1. Ambiguous Consent for Sensitive Personal Data Pancentric Digital’s policy allows for the collection and processing of sensitive personal data based on user submission, but the consent mechanism is vague and lacks explicit, granular consent as required by GDPR Article 9. This exposes the company to regulatory scrutiny and potential fines.

Legal Analysis

critical Risk

Removed

Added

With regard to any sensitive personal data (as defined in the General Data Protection Regulation and Data Protection Act 2018) which we collect from you, upon submissionwe will obtain your explicit, informed, and specific consent for each category of any items including suchsensitive data through the Websiteprior to processing, you hereby expresslyin accordance with GDPR Article 9. You may withdraw your consent to ourat any time, and we will immediately cease processing ofand remove such sensitive personal data for the purpose of the inclusion of that sensitive personal data on the Websiteupon request.

Legal Explanation

The original clause assumes consent upon submission but does not provide for explicit, granular consent or withdrawal rights as required by GDPR Article 9. The revision ensures compliance by requiring clear, specific consent and withdrawal mechanisms.

2. Unclear Data Retention Policy The policy states, “We keep your personal data for only as long as we need to,” without specifying retention periods or criteria for deletion. Under GDPR Article 5(1)(e), organizations must define and communicate clear retention schedules. Failure to do so can result in enforcement actions and costly audits.

Legal Analysis

high Risk

Removed

Added

We keepretain your personal data for only as long as we need to. How long we need you personal data depends on what we are using it for, as set out the period necessary to fulfill the purposes outlined in this privacy policy. For example, we may needsubject to use it to answer your queries about specific retention periods: (a product or service and as a result may keep personal) enquiry data while you are still using our product or services. We may also need to keep your personal datais retained for 12 months; (b) subscription and accounting purposes,data is retained for example, where7 years to comply with legal obligations; (c) marketing data is retained until you have bought a subscriptionwithdraw consent or opt out. If we no longer need your dataAfter these periods, wedata will delete itbe securely deleted or make it anonymous by removing all details that identify youanonymized.

Legal Explanation

The original clause lacks specificity and does not meet GDPR’s requirement for defined retention periods. The revision provides clear, purpose-based retention schedules, reducing regulatory risk and improving transparency.

3. Inadequate Security Disclosure for Data Transmission While Pancentric Digital highlights ISO/IEC 27001 certification, it also admits that data transmission via the website is not secure or encrypted unless otherwise indicated. This contradiction, without clear warnings or alternative secure channels, increases the risk of data breaches and related liability—potentially resulting in six-figure regulatory fines and class action exposure.

Legal Analysis

high Risk

Removed

Added

Transmission of personal data and information via the Website is not a secure or encrypted transmission method for sending your personal data, unless otherwise indicated on the Websitewill be secured using industry-standard encryption (e. Accordinglyg., your attention is drawn to the fact that any informationTLS/SSL) for all forms and personal data carried over the Internetsubmissions. Where encryption is not available, users will be clearly warned and provided with alternative secure submission options. InformationWe are committed to ensuring the confidentiality and integrity of your personal data may be intercepted, lost, redirected, corrupted, changed and accessed by other peopleduring transmission.

Legal Explanation

The original clause merely disclaims responsibility without providing adequate security measures or alternatives. The revision aligns with GDPR Article 32 on security of processing and demonstrates a proactive approach to data protection.

4. Insufficient Clarity on Third-Party Data Sharing and Cookie Use The policy references sharing cookie data with Google Adwords but lacks a detailed explanation of what data is shared, the legal basis, and user opt-out mechanisms. This ambiguity may violate GDPR transparency requirements and could trigger regulatory investigations or user complaints.

Legal Analysis

high Risk

Removed

Added

Cookie data pertaining to yourself maybe, including geolocation, device, and browsing history, may be collected and shared with our third-party advertiseradvertisers such as Google Adwords to inform our marketing activities based ononly with your behaviour on our site but thisprior informed consent. We provide clear information is purely based on what data is shared, the purposes, and how you can opt out or manage your geolocationpreferences at any time, devicein accordance with GDPR transparency and browsing historyconsent requirements.

Legal Explanation

The original clause does not specify the legal basis for sharing or provide opt-out mechanisms. The revision ensures transparency, user control, and compliance with GDPR Articles 13 and 14.

---

Conclusion: Strengthening Legal Defenses and Reducing Financial Exposure Our examination shows that Pancentric Digital’s Privacy Policy contains several preventable legal risks—each with the potential for significant financial and reputational damage. By implementing the recommended redlines, the company can proactively mitigate exposure to regulatory fines, litigation costs, and customer trust erosion.

Is your organization’s privacy framework robust enough to withstand regulatory scrutiny? How much could a single compliance gap cost your business? Are you prepared for the next wave of privacy enforcement?

This analysis is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For actual legal guidance, consult with a licensed attorney. This assessment is based on publicly available information and professional legal analysis. See erayaha.ai’s terms of service for liability limitations.