Maret School Terms & Conditions: Key Legal Risks and Redline Solutions | Erayaha

## Uncovering Legal Risks in Maret School’s Terms & Conditions

When we examined Maret School’s Terms & Conditions, our analysis revealed several legal and logical vulnerabilities that could expose the institution to substantial regulatory fines, litigation costs, and reputational harm. For example, failure to comply with privacy regulations such as GDPR or COPPA can result in penalties up to €20 million or 4% of annual revenue, while ambiguous contract language can undermine enforceability in court, leading to costly disputes. Below, we highlight four key issues and provide actionable redline solutions to strengthen Maret School’s legal framework.

1. Ambiguous Consent for Data Sharing with Third Parties Maret’s T&C states that PII may be shared with agents, contractors, or service providers, but lacks explicit user consent requirements and fails to specify data protection obligations for these third parties. This ambiguity can result in non-compliance with GDPR/CCPA, exposing Maret to regulatory fines and class action lawsuits.

Legal Analysis

high Risk

Removed

Added

The School does not sell, rent, give away, or loan a user’s PII to any third parties (other thanincluding agents, contractors, or service providers of Maret School) unless: (a) the School has obtained the user’s (or the user’s parent/guardian'’s) explicit, informed consent; (b) the third party has contractually agreed to comply with all applicable privacy laws (including GDPR and CCPA) and to use the PII solely for the specified purpose; or (c) disclosure is required by subpoena, court order, or other legal process to do so.

Legal Explanation

The original clause is ambiguous about the consent mechanism and does not require third parties to adhere to privacy laws. The revision clarifies explicit consent and mandates contractual compliance, reducing regulatory and litigation risk.

2. Unclear Data Retention and Deletion Practices The current policy allows for residual copies of user data to remain in backup systems without a defined deletion timeframe. This lack of specificity can violate data minimization and retention requirements under GDPR and CCPA, risking fines and eroding user trust.

Legal Analysis

medium Risk

Removed

Added

Because of the way Maret maintains certain services, afterAfter a user deletesrequests deletion of their information, all residual copies may take a period of time before they arewill be deleted from the School’s active servers within 30 days and may remain in thefrom backup systems within 90 days, except where retention is required by law. The School will provide confirmation of deletion upon request.

Legal Explanation

The original clause lacks a defined timeframe for deletion and does not address user notification. The revision sets clear deadlines and transparency, aligning with GDPR/CCPA data minimization and user rights requirements.

3. Overbroad Right to Unilaterally Change Privacy Policy Maret reserves the right to change its Privacy Policy at its sole discretion, with only 30 days’ notice. This clause lacks user opt-out provisions and may be deemed unconscionable or unenforceable, especially if material changes affect user rights retroactively. Such practices have led to high-profile litigation and settlements exceeding $5 million in similar cases.

Legal Analysis

high Risk

Removed

Added

Maret reserves the right, at its sole discretion, to changemay update this Privacy Policy in whole or in part, at anyfrom time to time. The School will post substantiveMaterial changes will be communicated to the Privacy Policyusers at least 30 days before they take effect. Visitors’ continued use of the website after any changes to the Privacy Policy have become effectivein advance, and users will be considered acceptanceprovided with an opportunity to review and, where required by law, to opt out of thoseor reject material changes that affect their rights or the use of their PII.

Legal Explanation

The original clause allows unilateral changes without user recourse, risking unenforceability and regulatory action. The revision introduces user opt-out rights and advance notice, aligning with best practices and legal standards.

4. Insufficient Parental Consent Mechanisms Under COPPA While Maret claims compliance with COPPA, the T&C does not describe the process for obtaining verifiable parental consent or the technical safeguards in place. This omission could result in regulatory action by the FTC, with statutory penalties up to $43,792 per violation.

Legal Analysis

critical Risk

Removed

Added

COPPA requires that website operators never knowingly request PII from anyone under the age of 13 without requesting verifiable parental consent. In accordancecompliance with COPPA, the School does not knowingly collectimplements a verifiable parental consent process before collecting any PII from childrenusers under the age of 13, including digital signature or government-issued ID verification. In the event that Maret determines that a userThe School maintains records of this site is underconsent and provides parents with the age of 13, the School will not maintain or use her or his PIIability to review and delete their child’s information at any time.

Legal Explanation

The original clause does not specify the method for obtaining verifiable parental consent or parental rights to access/delete data. The revision details the process and safeguards, reducing FTC enforcement risk.

Conclusion: Proactive Legal Protection is Essential

Our analysis demonstrates that addressing these contract weaknesses is not just a matter of regulatory compliance, but also crucial for protecting Maret School from significant financial and reputational harm. Implementing the recommended redline improvements will help ensure enforceability, transparency, and user trust.

How robust are your organization’s current privacy and compliance safeguards?
What would be the cost of a single regulatory breach or class action lawsuit?
Are your contracts regularly reviewed for logical errors and enforceability?

This analysis is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For actual legal guidance, consult with a licensed attorney. This assessment is based on publicly available information and professional legal analysis. See erayaha.ai’s terms of service for liability limitations.