Johnson City Press Terms & Conditions: 4 Critical Legal Risks and How to Fix Them | Erayaha

## When We Examined Johnson City Press’s Terms: 4 Legal Risks That Could Cost Millions

Imagine a scenario where a single ambiguous clause exposes Johnson City Press to a $2 million class action, or a compliance gap triggers a GDPR fine of up to €20 million. Our analysis of Johnson City Press’s Terms & Conditions reveals four critical legal and logical errors that could result in significant financial and reputational damage if left unaddressed.

1. Overbroad Liability Disclaimer Leaves Room for Unenforceability The current limitation of liability clause attempts to waive all forms of liability, including for negligence and direct damages. U.S. courts and many state consumer protection laws often invalidate such blanket disclaimers, especially when they attempt to exclude liability for gross negligence or willful misconduct. This exposes Johnson City Press to unpredictable litigation costs and potential damages, which can easily exceed $500,000 per incident in media lawsuits.

Legal Analysis

critical Risk

Removed

Added

A COVERED PARTY (AS DEFINED BELOW) SHALL NOT BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES OF ANY KIND WHATSOEVER (INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, ATTORNEYS' FEES AND LOST PROFITS OR SAVINGS) IN ANY WAY DUE TO, RESULTING FROM, OR ARISING IN CONNECTION WITH THIS SITE OR THE SERVICES, INCLUDING ITS CONTENT, REGARDLESS OF ANYEXCEPT TO THE EXTENT SUCH DAMAGES RESULT FROM GROSS NEGLIGENCE, WILLFUL MISCONDUCT, OR VIOLATION OF ANYAPPLICABLE LAW BY A COVERED PARTY. NOTHING IN THIS CLAUSE SHALL LIMIT LIABILITY WHERE SUCH LIMITATION IS PROHIBITED BY LAW.

Legal Explanation

The original clause attempts to disclaim all liability, including for negligence and direct damages, which is often unenforceable under U.S. law and state consumer protection statutes. The revision carves out exceptions for gross negligence, willful misconduct, and statutory violations, improving enforceability and reducing the risk of the entire clause being invalidated.

2. Arbitration Clause May Violate Consumer Protection Standards The arbitration provision mandates binding arbitration and waives class actions, but lacks clear language about consumer rights, opt-out procedures, and unconscionability safeguards. Courts have struck down similar clauses for failing to provide fair notice or reasonable opportunity to opt out, risking invalidation and class action exposure—potentially costing millions in aggregated claims.

Legal Analysis

high Risk

Removed

Added

You agree that all disputes, actions, and claims relating to your access to or use of the site, Services, and all matters arising out of or related to these Terms of Use (except for legal action taken to seek an injunction or other equitable relief related to the Site, Services, or user generated content, or claims related to the validity or enforceability of your or our intellectual property rights) (collectively “Dispute”) will be governed by the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA), federal arbitration law, and laws of the State of Tennessee, without regard to choice of law principles. You furthermore agree that anyAny Dispute will be resolved by binding arbitration, rather than in court, except that you may assert claims in small claims court if your claims qualify. You are giving uphave the right to litigate (or participateopt out of this arbitration provision within 30 days of acceptance by notifying Six Rivers Media in as a party or class member) all Disputeswriting. Nothing in court before a judge or jurythis clause waives any non-waivable statutory rights under applicable consumer protection laws. Instead,Class action waivers and arbitration requirements are subject to applicable law and may not apply in all Disputes will be resolved before a neutral arbitrator, whose decision will be final except for a limited right of appeal under the FAAjurisdictions.

Legal Explanation

The original clause lacks an opt-out mechanism and fails to clarify that some consumer rights cannot be waived. The revision adds a clear opt-out window and acknowledges statutory protections, aligning with recent court decisions and FTC guidance, thus reducing the risk of the clause being invalidated.

3. User Content License Is Excessively Broad and Risks IP Litigation The terms grant Six Rivers Media a perpetual, irrevocable, fully sublicensable license to all user content, without limitation or opt-out. This could deter users, violate moral rights in some jurisdictions, and trigger copyright disputes. IP litigation defense costs can exceed $250,000, and statutory damages for copyright infringement can reach $150,000 per work.

Legal Analysis

high Risk

Removed

Added

By submitting User Content, you automatically grant Six Rivers Media a world-wideworldwide, royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable, non-exclusive, fully sublicensable and transferable, right and license to use, record, sell, lease, reproduce, distribute, create derivative works, from publicly displaying or perform, transmit, publish, and otherwise exploitdisplay such content solely for the User Contentpurposes of operating, in whole or part as Six Rivers Media deems appropriate includingpromoting, butand improving the Site and related services. This license does not limited toaffect your ownership rights and may be revoked by you at any time upon written notice, in connection withexcept to the extent necessary for ongoing operation of the Site. Six Rivers Media, its subsidiaries, affiliates, will not use User Content for commercial resale or businesssublicensing without your explicit consent.

Legal Explanation

The original clause is excessively broad, risking copyright and moral rights violations. The revision limits the license to necessary uses, preserves user ownership, and allows revocation, reducing IP litigation risk and aligning with industry standards.

4. Privacy Policy Incorporation and Data Usage Ambiguity The T&C incorporate the Privacy Policy by reference but fail to specify data collection, processing, and user consent mechanisms. This ambiguity creates a compliance gap with GDPR/CCPA, risking regulatory fines of up to 4% of annual global turnover or €20 million, whichever is higher.

Legal Analysis

critical Risk

Removed

Added

By using this site or related services, you agree to be legally bound by these terms of use and Six Rivers Media's Privacy Policy (http:// https://www.johnsoncitypress.com/site/privacy.html), which is incorporated as partherein by reference. The Privacy Policy clearly specifies the categories of these terms of usepersonal data collected, the purposes for which data is processed, the legal basis for processing, user rights (including access, correction, and deletion), and mechanisms for obtaining user consent in compliance with GDPR and CCPA.

Legal Explanation

The original clause incorporates the Privacy Policy but lacks specificity about data collection, processing, and user rights, creating compliance gaps with GDPR/CCPA. The revision mandates clear disclosure and consent mechanisms, reducing regulatory risk.

---

Conclusion: Proactive Legal Protection Is Essential Our analysis highlights four preventable legal risks in Johnson City Press’s Terms & Conditions. Addressing these issues will not only reduce exposure to costly litigation and regulatory fines but also build user trust and business resilience.

How often do you review your digital contracts for enforceability and compliance?
What would a multimillion-dollar lawsuit mean for your organization’s future?
Are your terms protecting you—or putting you at risk?

This analysis is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For actual legal guidance, consult with a licensed attorney. This assessment is based on publicly available information and professional legal analysis. Refer to erayaha.ai’s terms of service for liability limitations.