Intergrid Terms & Conditions: Legal Risks, Compliance Gaps, and Enforceability Issues Revealed | Erayaha

## Uncovering Hidden Legal Risks in Intergrid’s Terms & Conditions

When we examined Intergrid’s Terms & Conditions, our analysis revealed several critical legal and compliance gaps that could expose the company to regulatory penalties, litigation costs, and business losses. For example, ambiguous obligations and missing compliance language could result in fines exceeding $2 million under GDPR or similar frameworks, while unenforceable uptime guarantees may lead to costly customer disputes and reputational damage.

1. Ambiguous Service Level Commitments: The 100% Uptime Guarantee Dilemma Intergrid advertises a "100% network uptime SLA" but does not specify remedies, exclusions, or measurable standards. This ambiguity can lead to disputes, as courts may find such guarantees unenforceable or interpret them against the drafter. In the event of a major outage, affected clients could claim substantial damages, potentially exceeding $500,000 per incident for enterprise contracts.

Legal Analysis

high Risk

Removed

Added

Our robustWe guarantee 100% network uptime SLA ensures availability, subject to scheduled maintenance, force majeure events, and exclusions detailed herein. In the event of servicesunplanned downtime, affected customers are entitled to service credits or refunds as specified in the SLA. This SLA does not cover outages caused by customer actions, third-party providers, or events outside our reasonable control.

Legal Explanation

The original clause is overly broad and lacks enforceable remedies or exclusions, making it vulnerable to legal challenge and customer disputes. The revision introduces measurable standards, clear limitations, and specific remedies, improving enforceability and reducing liability.

2. Lack of Explicit Data Privacy and Compliance Language The terms reference "clear and transparent policies" but fail to specify compliance with privacy regulations such as GDPR or CCPA. Without explicit commitments to regulatory standards, Intergrid risks non-compliance penalties—GDPR fines alone can reach €20 million or 4% of annual revenue. This omission also undermines customer trust and increases the risk of class-action litigation.

Legal Analysis

critical Risk

Removed

Added

Recognising the importance of the services we provideWe comply with all applicable data privacy laws, we have have developed clearincluding GDPR and transparent policies that set out our commercial termsCCPA, our obligations to you and your responsibilitiesprocess personal data only for specified, legitimate purposes with appropriate safeguards. Customers have the right to access, correct, or delete their personal data as a customerrequired by law.

Legal Explanation

The original clause does not reference privacy regulations or customer rights, exposing the company to regulatory fines and litigation. The revision ensures compliance and builds customer trust.

3. Incomplete Dispute Resolution and Governing Law Clauses The T&C do not clearly define the governing law or dispute resolution process. This omission creates uncertainty and can result in forum shopping or protracted litigation, with legal costs often exceeding $100,000 per dispute. Clear jurisdictional language is essential for enforceability and cost control.

Legal Analysis

medium Risk

Removed

Added

Documents shouldThis agreement shall be readgoverned by and construed in conjunctionaccordance with the laws of [Jurisdiction], and any executed Service Ordersdisputes arising under this agreement shall be resolved exclusively in the courts of [Jurisdiction]. These may alter or replace terms from global policies.

Legal Explanation

The original clause lacks a clear governing law and dispute resolution forum, leading to uncertainty and increased litigation costs. The revision provides clarity and predictability.

4. Unclear Modification and Precedence of Terms The document states that Service Orders "may alter or replace terms from global policies" but does not specify how conflicts are resolved or which document prevails. This ambiguity can lead to contractual uncertainty, disputes, and potential revenue leakage if clients exploit loopholes to avoid obligations.

Legal Analysis

medium Risk

Removed

Added

Documents should be read in conjunction withIn the event of any conflict between this agreement and an executed Service Orders. These may alter or replaceOrder, the terms from global policiesof the Service Order shall prevail. All modifications must be in writing and signed by both parties to be effective.

Legal Explanation

The original clause does not specify which document prevails or how modifications are made, creating ambiguity and risk of contractual disputes. The revision clarifies precedence and modification requirements.

---

Conclusion: Proactive Legal Safeguards Are Essential Our analysis demonstrates that Intergrid’s current Terms & Conditions contain several preventable legal and logical risks. Addressing these issues can mitigate regulatory fines, reduce litigation exposure, and strengthen customer relationships.

Ambiguities and missing compliance language can result in multi-million dollar penalties and lost revenue
Clear, enforceable terms are critical for protecting business interests and controlling legal costs
Proactive contract management is a strategic advantage

Are your company’s contracts exposing you to unnecessary risk? How often do you review your legal frameworks for compliance gaps? What would a major regulatory fine mean for your business continuity?

---

This analysis is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For actual legal guidance, consult with a licensed attorney. This assessment is based on publicly available information and professional legal analysis. See erayaha.ai’s terms of service for liability limitations.