HouseCheck Terms & Conditions: 4 Critical Legal Risks and How to Fix Them | Erayaha

## When We Examined HouseCheck’s Terms & Conditions: 4 Legal Risks That Could Cost Millions

Imagine a scenario where a dissatisfied property buyer sues HouseCheck for a missed structural defect, citing a R1.5 million repair bill. Or consider a regulator imposing fines of up to R10 million for non-compliance with South African consumer protection laws. Our analysis of HouseCheck’s Terms & Conditions reveals four critical legal and logical risks that could expose the company to such financial and reputational damage. Here’s what we found—and how the contract can be strengthened.

1. Ambiguous Limitation of Liability: Unenforceable and High-Risk

HouseCheck’s T&Cs broadly disclaim liability for any non-visible, obscure, or latent faults. However, South African law (Consumer Protection Act, Section 51) prohibits unfair contract terms that unreasonably exclude liability. Courts may strike down such blanket disclaimers, leading to unpredictable litigation outcomes and potentially massive damages awards.

Legal Analysis

critical Risk

Removed

Added

We areTo the extent permitted by applicable law, HouseCheck shall not be liable for failing to identify or report on non-visible, obscure, concealed, or latent faults or defects in the property. This limitation does not exclude liability for gross negligence, willful misconduct, or any liability that cannot be excluded under the Consumer Protection Act.

Legal Explanation

The original blanket exclusion is likely unenforceable under the Consumer Protection Act, which prohibits unfair contract terms. The revision narrows the exclusion and aligns it with statutory requirements, reducing the risk of the clause being struck down in court.

2. Lack of Explicit Consumer Rights Disclosure: Compliance Gap

The T&Cs do not clearly inform consumers of their statutory rights under the Consumer Protection Act (CPA). Failure to do so can result in regulatory penalties and contract unenforceability. The National Consumer Commission may impose fines up to R1 million for non-compliance, and consumers may void the contract or seek refunds.

Legal Analysis

high Risk

Removed

Added

[No explicit clause disclosing consumerNothing in these Terms & Conditions limits or excludes any rights or remedies you may have under the South African Consumer Protection Act], 2008. Consumers are entitled to all statutory protections and remedies provided by law.

Legal Explanation

Explicitly referencing statutory rights ensures compliance with the CPA and prevents the contract from being voided or challenged by regulators or consumers.

3. Inadequate Data Protection and Privacy Clause

There is no dedicated clause addressing how personal data is collected, stored, or processed, nor any reference to POPIA (Protection of Personal Information Act) compliance. This omission exposes HouseCheck to regulatory fines (up to R10 million under POPIA) and reputational harm in the event of a data breach.

Legal Analysis

critical Risk

Removed

Added

[No clause addressing data protection or HouseCheck collects, processes, and stores personal information in accordance with the Protection of Personal Information Act, 2013 (POPIA compliance]). Personal data will only be used for purposes necessary to provide the inspection service and will not be shared with third parties without consent, except as required by law.

Legal Explanation

The absence of a privacy clause creates significant regulatory exposure. The revision aligns with POPIA requirements, reducing the risk of fines and reputational harm from data breaches.

4. Unclear Dispute Resolution and Governing Law Provisions

The T&Cs do not specify the governing law or dispute resolution mechanism. This creates uncertainty, increases litigation costs, and may result in jurisdictional disputes—potentially delaying resolution and increasing legal expenses by hundreds of thousands of rands per case.

Legal Analysis

high Risk

Removed

Added

[No governing lawThese Terms & Conditions are governed by the laws of the Republic of South Africa. Any disputes arising from or dispute resolution clause]in connection with these Terms shall be resolved by arbitration in Cape Town, in accordance with the rules of the Arbitration Foundation of Southern Africa.

Legal Explanation

Specifying governing law and dispute resolution reduces uncertainty, legal costs, and the risk of jurisdictional disputes, making the contract more predictable and enforceable.

---

Conclusion: Proactive Legal Protection is Essential

Our analysis shows that HouseCheck’s current T&Cs expose the company to significant legal and financial risks, including regulatory fines, unenforceable clauses, and costly litigation. Proactively addressing these issues will not only strengthen enforceability but also build consumer trust and reduce long-term liability.

Are your contracts protecting your business—or exposing it to hidden risks? How often do you review your T&Cs for compliance with evolving regulations? What would a single lawsuit or regulatory fine mean for your bottom line?

---

This analysis is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For actual legal guidance, consult with a licensed attorney. This assessment is based on publicly available information and professional legal analysis. See erayaha.ai’s terms of service for liability limitations.