Girls on the Run Georgia: Legal Risks & Contract Loopholes Exposed in 2024 Terms & Conditions | Erayaha

## When Legal Loopholes Cost More Than You Think: Girls on the Run Georgia T&C Case Study

Imagine a scenario where a single ambiguous clause in your website’s terms exposes you to $100,000+ in litigation costs, or a compliance gap triggers regulatory fines of up to $2 million under GDPR or CCPA. Our analysis of Girls on the Run Georgia’s Terms & Conditions reveals several high-impact legal and logical risks that could result in substantial financial and reputational damage if left unaddressed.

1. Unilateral Modification Rights Without Notice Girls on the Run Georgia reserves the right to change the terms, conditions, and notices at any time, without any obligation to notify users. This exposes the organization to claims of unfair contract terms and potential unenforceability, especially under consumer protection laws (e.g., FTC, EU Directive 93/13/EEC). Courts have invalidated such clauses, leading to costly disputes and forced contract rewrites.

Legal Analysis

high Risk

Removed

Added

Girls on the Run Georgia reserves the right to change thethese terms, conditions, and notices under which the Girls on the Run Georgia Web Site is offered; however, including but not limitedany material changes will be communicated to users at least 30 days in advance via email or prominent notice on the charges associated with thewebsite. Continued use after such notice constitutes acceptance of the Girls on the Run Georgia Web Sitenew terms.

Legal Explanation

Unilateral modification without notice is considered unfair and may be unenforceable under consumer protection laws. The revision ensures users are informed and provides a clear acceptance mechanism, improving enforceability and reducing regulatory risk.

2. Overbroad License to User Submissions The T&C grants Girls on the Run Georgia a sweeping, perpetual license to use user submissions without compensation or clear limitations. This could result in IP disputes and privacy complaints, with statutory damages reaching $150,000 per infringement under the Copyright Act.

Legal Analysis

high Risk

Removed

Added

However, by posting, uploading, inputting, providing orBy submitting your Submissioncontent, you are grantinggrant Girls on the Run Georgia a non-exclusive, its affiliated companies and necessary sublicensees permissionworldwide, royalty-free license to use your Submission in connection withsolely for purposes related to the operation and promotion of their Internet businesses including, without limitation, the rights to: copy, distribute, transmit, publicly display, publicly perform, reproduce, edit, translatewebsite and reformatits services. Any use beyond these purposes will require your Submission; and to publish your nameexplicit written consent. You retain all ownership rights in connection with your Submission. No compensation will be paid with respect to the use of your Submission, as provided herein.

Legal Explanation

The original clause is overly broad and lacks clear limitations, risking IP and privacy disputes. The revision narrows the license scope, ensures user ownership, and aligns with best practices for user-generated content.

3. Excessive Disclaimer and Limitation of Liability The liability disclaimer attempts to exclude all damages, including those for gross negligence or willful misconduct, and may be unenforceable in many jurisdictions (e.g., California Civil Code §1668). Failure to tailor disclaimers to legal standards can result in multi-million dollar judgments and insurance claim denials.

Legal Analysis

critical Risk

Removed

Added

TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAWExcept as prohibited by law, IN NO EVENT SHALL Girls on the Run Georgia AND/OR ITS SUPPLIERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECTand its suppliers shall not be liable for indirect, INDIRECTincidental, PUNITIVEspecial, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES OR ANY DAMAGES WHATSOEVER INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF USE, DATA OR PROFITS, ARISING OUT OF OR IN ANY WAY CONNECTED WITH THE USE OR PERFORMANCE OF THE Girls onor consequential damages arising from use of the Run Georgia WEB SITE, website... WHETHER BASED ON CONTRACT This limitation does not apply to liability resulting from gross negligence, TORTwillful misconduct, NEGLIGENCE, STRICT LIABILITY OR OTHERWISE, EVEN IF Girls on the Run Georgia OR ANY OF ITS SUPPLIERS HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF DAMAGESor statutory violations.

Legal Explanation

The original clause attempts to exclude all liability, including for gross negligence or willful misconduct, which is unenforceable in many jurisdictions. The revision tailors the limitation to legal standards, reducing the risk of invalidation and costly litigation.

4. Inconsistent Governing Law and Jurisdiction The agreement specifies Washington law but assigns exclusive jurisdiction to courts in San Mateo County, California. This inconsistency can render jurisdiction clauses void, leading to protracted venue disputes and increased litigation costs—often exceeding $50,000 per case.

Legal Analysis

medium Risk

Removed

Added

To the maximum extent permitted by law, thisThis agreement is governed by the laws of the State of Washington, U.S.A. and you hereby consent to the exclusive jurisdiction and venue of courts in San Mateo County, California, U.S.A. in alland any disputes arising out offrom or relating to this agreement shall be resolved exclusively in the use of the Girls on the Run Georgia Web Sitestate or federal courts located in Washington State.

Legal Explanation

Specifying Washington law but California courts creates a jurisdictional conflict, risking voided clauses and costly venue disputes. The revision aligns governing law and jurisdiction, improving predictability and enforceability.

---

Key Takeaways & Proactive Solutions Our examination shows that even well-intentioned terms can contain costly loopholes. Addressing these issues not only reduces regulatory and litigation risk but also strengthens user trust and business resilience. Proactive legal review is essential to avoid preventable losses and regulatory penalties.

Are your contracts exposing you to hidden liabilities? How often do you review your terms for compliance with evolving laws? What would a $2 million fine mean for your organization’s future?

---

This analysis is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For actual legal guidance, consult with a licensed attorney. This assessment is based on publicly available information and professional legal analysis. See erayaha.ai's terms of service for liability limitations.