•
Fenner & Esler Insurance - A&E Professional Liability logo
Fenner & Esler Insurance - A&E Professional Liability

Fenner & Esler Insurance: Key Legal Risks in A&E Professional Liability Terms & Conditions

Our analysis of Fenner & Esler Insurance's A&E Professional Liability terms reveals critical privacy, compliance, and liability risks. Discover actionable solutions to strengthen enforceability and reduce exposure.

## When We Examined Fenner & Esler Insurance’s Terms: What’s at Stake?

Imagine a scenario where a regulatory audit uncovers gaps in privacy disclosures, or a client dispute escalates due to ambiguous liability terms. Our analysis of Fenner & Esler Insurance’s A&E Professional Liability Terms & Conditions reveals several key legal and logical risks that could expose the company to regulatory fines exceeding $1 million, reputational harm, and costly litigation. Here’s what our review uncovered—and how targeted improvements can mitigate these risks.

1. Ambiguous Data Collection Purposes: Regulatory Non-Compliance

The current privacy policy states that information is collected and used as deemed necessary to administer business and advise about products. However, this language is vague and does not specify the lawful basis for data processing, as required by GDPR and CCPA. This ambiguity can result in regulatory penalties, with GDPR fines reaching up to €20 million or 4% of annual global turnover.

Legal Analysis
high Risk
Removed
Added
We collect and use personal information we believe is necessary to administer our businesssolely for the specific purposes outlined in this section, to advise you about productsin accordance with applicable privacy laws including GDPR and servicesCCPA, and to provide youonly with customer serviceappropriate legal basis such as consent, contractual necessity, or legitimate business interest.

Legal Explanation

The original clause is overly broad and does not specify the lawful basis for data processing, as required by GDPR and CCPA. The revision clarifies the purposes and legal grounds, reducing regulatory risk and improving enforceability.

2. Insufficient Disclosure of Third-Party Sharing

The terms mention sharing information with insurance companies and service providers but lack explicit details on categories of recipients, purposes, and safeguards. This omission can lead to compliance gaps under privacy laws, increasing the risk of enforcement actions and class-action lawsuits, with settlements often exceeding $500,000 in the insurance sector.

Legal Analysis
medium Risk
Removed
Added
We do not sell or provide customer information to persons or organizations outside our agency (other thanthird parties, except to those insurance companies who may provide coverage or quotationsservice providers as necessary for our clientsthe purposes described herein. When sharing information, we ensure recipients are contractually obligated to maintain confidentiality and prospective clients)comply with applicable privacy laws.

Legal Explanation

The original clause lacks specificity regarding categories of recipients, purposes, and safeguards. The revision clarifies these points, supporting compliance with GDPR/CCPA and reducing risk of unauthorized disclosures.

3. Lack of Explicit Data Subject Rights

There is no mention of clients’ rights to access, correct, or delete their personal data. Failing to inform users of these rights is a direct violation of GDPR Article 13 and CCPA requirements, potentially resulting in regulatory investigations and fines.

Legal Analysis
high Risk
Removed
Added
[No clause present regarding data subjectYou have the right to access, correct, or request deletion of your personal information, as well as to object to or restrict certain processing activities, in accordance with applicable privacy laws. To exercise these rights], please contact us at the information provided below.

Legal Explanation

Absence of data subject rights violates GDPR Article 13 and CCPA, increasing risk of regulatory fines and reputational harm. The revision ensures compliance and transparency.

4. Absence of Limitation of Liability Clause

The T&C do not contain a limitation of liability provision, exposing the company to unlimited damages in the event of a dispute or data breach. Without such a clause, litigation costs and damages could easily surpass $1 million per incident, especially in professional liability cases.

Legal Analysis
critical Risk
Removed
Added
[No limitation ofTo the maximum extent permitted by law, our liability clause present]for any claim arising out of or relating to these terms shall be limited to the total amount paid by you for our services in the twelve months preceding the claim, except in cases of willful misconduct or gross negligence.

Legal Explanation

Without a limitation of liability clause, the company is exposed to unlimited damages. The revision caps liability, providing predictability and reducing financial exposure in litigation.

---

Conclusion: Proactive Legal Protection is Essential

Our examination shows that Fenner & Esler Insurance’s current terms expose the company to significant regulatory, financial, and reputational risks. Addressing these issues with clear, compliant language and robust contractual protections is crucial to avoid costly enforcement actions and litigation.

  • How prepared is your organization to withstand a regulatory audit of its privacy and liability terms?
  • What would be the financial impact of a single class-action lawsuit or regulatory fine under current terms?
  • Are your contracts evolving to meet changing legal standards and client expectations?

Legal Disclaimer: This analysis is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For actual legal guidance, consult with a licensed attorney. This assessment is based on publicly available information and professional legal analysis. Please refer to erayaha.ai’s terms of service regarding liability limitations.