DHJJ Accountants’ Terms: 4 Legal Risks That Could Cost Millions
A legal analysis of DHJJ’s Terms & Conditions reveals four critical risks: privacy, IP, liability, and governing law. Learn how to mitigate costly exposure.
## When We Examined DHJJ’s Terms: Four Legal Risks That Could Cost Millions
Imagine a scenario where a single ambiguous clause exposes your business to $2M in privacy fines, or a missing safeguard leads to six-figure litigation. Our analysis of DHJJ Certified Public Accountants and Business Advisors’ Terms & Conditions reveals four critical legal and logical risks—each with substantial financial and regulatory implications.
1. Unrestricted Use of User Contributions: A Data Privacy Time Bomb
The T&C state that any information or material you transmit is considered non-confidential and non-proprietary, with no obligations on DHJJ. This blanket approach fails to address obligations under GDPR, CCPA, and other privacy laws, exposing the company to fines up to 4% of global turnover or $2M, whichever is higher.
Legal Explanation
The original clause ignores privacy law requirements for handling personal data, risking regulatory fines. The revision ensures compliance with privacy regulations and clarifies obligations regarding user data.
2. Overbroad Intellectual Property Grant: Risk of IP Disputes
The terms allow DHJJ to use all user-submitted data “for any and all purposes” without limitation or attribution. This overreach can trigger IP disputes, especially if confidential or proprietary business data is involved. Litigation costs for IP infringement can exceed $500,000 per case.
Legal Explanation
The original clause grants overly broad rights, risking IP infringement claims. The revision narrows the scope, reduces exposure, and aligns with best practices for user-generated content.
3. Blanket Disclaimer of Liability: Unenforceable and Risky
The limitation of liability clause attempts to exclude all forms of damages, including direct damages, which is generally unenforceable in many jurisdictions and can be struck down in court. This exposes DHJJ to uncapped damages, with average business litigation settlements ranging from $100,000 to $1M.
Legal Explanation
The original clause’s blanket exclusion of all liability is generally unenforceable. The revision provides a reasonable cap and preserves mandatory liabilities, improving enforceability.
4. Governing Law Clause: Conflict with International Users
The T&C specify Illinois law without addressing users outside the US. This creates enforceability gaps and potential conflicts with local consumer protection laws, increasing the risk of regulatory action and forum shopping.
Legal Explanation
The original clause ignores mandatory consumer protections for international users, risking unenforceability and regulatory penalties. The revision addresses cross-border compliance.
---
Key Takeaways & Business Implications
Our analysis shows that these four issues could expose DHJJ to millions in fines, litigation, and reputational damage. Proactive redlining and legal review can close these gaps, ensuring enforceability and compliance.
Are your contracts exposing you to hidden risks? How would a regulatory audit impact your business? What’s your plan for proactive legal protection?
---
This analysis is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For actual legal guidance, consult with a licensed attorney. This assessment is based on publicly available information and professional legal analysis. See erayaha.ai’s terms of service for liability limitations.