Connected Australia’s Privacy Policy: 4 Critical Legal Risks and How to Fix Them | Erayaha

## When Privacy Gaps Become Expensive: Connected Australia’s Legal Risks Unveiled

Imagine a scenario where a privacy complaint leads to a regulatory investigation—potentially resulting in fines up to $2.1 million per breach under the Australian Privacy Act, or even higher penalties for systemic issues. Our analysis of Connected Australia’s Privacy Policy reveals four critical legal and logical risks that could expose the company to significant financial and reputational harm.

1. Ambiguous Data Collection Purposes: Risk of Regulatory Fines Connected Australia’s policy states it may collect and use personal information for a “range of different purposes,” without specifying those purposes or legal bases. This ambiguity is non-compliant with the Australian Privacy Principles (APPs) and international standards like GDPR, both of which require clear, specific, and lawful purposes for data collection. Vague clauses can trigger regulatory scrutiny and costly litigation.

Legal Analysis

high Risk

Removed

Added

Depending on the particular circumstances, we mayWe collect and hold a range of differentpersonal information about you. This can include your name, datesolely for the specific purposes of birthproviding, contact details (including addressadministering, email address, phone number or mobile telephone number), occupation, driver’s license number, username or password, financial information (such as credit card or bank account numbers) and information about how you useimproving our products and services, verifying your identity, and complying with legal obligations, as detailed in this policy. This isWe do not an exhaustive list. For example, we may sometimes need to collect additional information as part of a user authentication processbeyond what is necessary for these purposes, such as when you want to speak to one of our customer service personnel who needs to access your accountin accordance with the Australian Privacy Principles and applicable law.

Legal Explanation

The original clause is overly broad and lacks specificity regarding the purposes and legal bases for data collection, creating ambiguity and non-compliance with privacy regulations. The revision clarifies the purposes, limits data collection to what is necessary, and references compliance with the APPs, reducing regulatory risk.

2. Overbroad Third-Party Disclosures: Unchecked Data Sharing The policy allows disclosure of personal information to a wide array of third parties—including business partners, dealers, and related entities—without limiting the scope or requiring contractual safeguards. This exposes Connected Australia to risks of data misuse, breaches, and potential joint liability under the Privacy Act and Telecommunications Act. A single data breach involving an inadequately protected third party could cost millions in remediation and class action settlements.

Legal Analysis

critical Risk

Removed

Added

We may disclose Your Informationyour personal information to third parties who provide-party service providers only as necessary for the provision of our services to us, including organisations and contractors that assist ussubject to strict contractual obligations requiring compliance with the purposes of which weAustralian Privacy Principles and data security standards. We do not permit third parties to use Your Informationyour information for their own purposes. These services include: Customer enquiries Installation, maintenance and repair services Mailing operations, billing, and debt-recovery functions Information technology and network services Market research, marketing, telemarketing and door-knocking services

Legal Explanation

The original clause allows broad disclosure to third parties without adequate limitations or safeguards. The revision restricts disclosure to necessary service providers, mandates contractual protections, and prohibits secondary use, aligning with privacy law requirements.

3. Inadequate Direct Marketing Opt-Out Mechanism: Consumer Law Exposure The policy permits ongoing direct marketing until the customer opts out, but fails to provide a clear, easily accessible opt-out mechanism as required by the Spam Act 2003 (Cth) and APP 7. Non-compliance can result in regulatory penalties exceeding $2 million per incident, as well as reputational damage and loss of customer trust.

Legal Analysis

high Risk

Removed

Added

ThisWe will provide a clear and easily accessible mechanism (such as an unsubscribe link in each marketing may be carriedcommunication) for you to opt out in a variety of ways (including by emaildirect marketing at any time, SMS/MMS, or social media or by customizing online content and displaying advertising on websitesin compliance with the Spam Act 2003 (Cth) and may continue after youAPP 7. Marketing communications will cease acquiring any products or services from us until youpromptly upon receipt of your opt-out by calling usrequest.

Legal Explanation

The original clause does not ensure an accessible opt-out mechanism, risking non-compliance with direct marketing laws. The revision mandates clear opt-out options and prompt cessation of marketing, reducing exposure to regulatory penalties.

4. Unilateral Policy Changes: Retroactive Application Risk The policy states that updates will apply to all information held at the time, without notice or consent. This creates a risk of retroactively applying new terms to previously collected data, which may be unenforceable and could trigger regulatory action or litigation under the Privacy Act and consumer protection laws. Legal best practice requires notice and, in some cases, consent for material changes.

Legal Analysis

medium Risk

Removed

Added

From time to time, weWe may need to changeupdate this Privacy Statement from time to time. If we do so, weMaterial changes will post the updated version on our Websitebe communicated to you in advance, and itwhere required by law, your consent will applybe obtained before applying changes to all of Your Information held by us at the timeinformation previously collected.

Legal Explanation

The original clause allows unilateral and retroactive policy changes without notice or consent, risking unenforceability and regulatory action. The revision requires advance notice and, where necessary, consent for material changes, aligning with legal best practices.

---

Conclusion: Proactive Redlining Prevents Costly Mistakes Our examination shows that Connected Australia’s privacy framework contains several high-impact legal risks. Addressing these issues with precise, compliant language will reduce exposure to regulatory fines, litigation costs, and reputational harm.

How confident are you that your privacy terms would withstand a regulatory audit?
What would a major data breach cost your business under current policies?
Are your customer communications and policy updates legally bulletproof?

This analysis is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For actual legal guidance, consult with a licensed attorney. This assessment is based on publicly available information and professional legal analysis. See erayaha.ai’s terms of service for liability limitations.