Care For the Homeless: Legal Risks and Compliance Gaps in Privacy Policy | Erayaha

## When Privacy Policies Leave the Door Open: A Legal Risk Case Study on Care For the Homeless

Imagine facing a GDPR or CCPA investigation after a data breach, only to discover your privacy policy leaves you exposed to fines exceeding $2 million. Our analysis of Care For the Homeless’s terms reveals several critical legal and logical errors that could result in substantial financial and reputational harm.

1. Ambiguous Data Collection and Processing Purposes Care For the Homeless’s policy describes collecting personal data for comments, donations, and newsletter subscriptions, but fails to specify the lawful basis or explicit processing purposes as required by GDPR (Art. 6) and CCPA. This ambiguity increases the risk of regulatory penalties and class action lawsuits.

Legal Analysis

high Risk

Removed

Added

When visitors leave comments on the site weWe collect theand process personal data shown in the, including information from comments form, only for specific, explicit, and also the visitor’s IP address and browser user agent string to help spam detection. An anonymized string created from your email addresslegitimate purposes as required by applicable privacy laws (also called a hashe.g., GDPR, CCPA) may be provided to the Gravatar service to see if you. The lawful basis for processing includes user consent or legitimate interest, and users are using itinformed of these purposes at the point of data collection.

Legal Explanation

The original clause is ambiguous about the purposes and legal basis for data collection, which is required by GDPR Art. 6 and CCPA. The revision clarifies lawful bases and ensures compliance, reducing regulatory risk.

2. Unrestricted Data Retention Periods The policy states that comment metadata is retained "indefinitely," without specifying criteria or maximum retention periods. Under GDPR (Art. 5), personal data must not be kept longer than necessary. Indefinite retention can trigger fines up to €20 million or 4% of annual revenue.

Legal Analysis

high Risk

Removed

Added

If you leave aWe retain comment, the comment data and its metadata are retained indefinitelyonly for as long as necessary to fulfill the purposes for which it was collected, in accordance with applicable data retention laws. This is so we can recognizeRetention periods are reviewed regularly and approve any follow-up comments automatically instead of holding them in a moderation queuedata is securely deleted when no longer required.

Legal Explanation

Indefinite retention of personal data violates GDPR Art. 5, which requires data minimization and storage limitation. The revision introduces lawful retention limits and review procedures.

3. Inadequate Third-Party Data Sharing Disclosures References to third-party processors (DonorPerfect, Constant Contact) lack clear contractual assurances of GDPR/CCPA compliance and do not inform users of cross-border data transfers. This omission exposes the organization to joint liability for third-party breaches or misuse.

Legal Analysis

high Risk

Removed

Added

Donor and subscriber information is stored in a secure database on https://www.donorperfect.com/ and is monitored regularly. Similarlyprocessed by third-party service providers under written agreements that require compliance with all applicable data protection laws, if you subscribe to any of our newsletters, your First Name, Last Name,including GDPR and E-Mail Address are stored in a secure database on https://wwwCCPA.constantcontact.com. Please review the privacy policies Users are informed of these sites for answers to any inquiries regarding your informationcross-border data transfers and their associated safeguards.

Legal Explanation

The original clause lacks assurances of third-party compliance and omits cross-border transfer disclosures, exposing the organization to joint liability for breaches. The revision mandates contractual compliance and transparency.

4. Incomplete User Rights and Data Deletion Procedures While users can request data export or erasure, the policy does not explain the process, timeframes, or exceptions for legal retention. This lack of clarity can lead to regulatory complaints and costly disputes over data subject rights.

Legal Analysis

medium Risk

Removed

Added

If you have an account on this site, or have left comments, you canUsers may request access to receive an exported file, export of the, or deletion of their personal data we hold about you, including any data you have provided toby contacting us through the methods provided in this policy. You can also request that we erase any personal data we hold about you. This does not include any data we are obliged to keep for administrativeRequests will be processed within 30 days, subject to legal retention requirements, and users will be informed of any exceptions or security purposesdelays.

Legal Explanation

The original clause does not specify the process or timeframe for handling data subject requests, which is required by GDPR (Art. 12-15). The revision introduces clear procedures and deadlines, reducing dispute risk.

---

Conclusion: Proactive Legal Protection is Essential Our examination shows that even well-intentioned privacy policies can create multi-million dollar liabilities if not drafted with regulatory precision. Organizations like Care For the Homeless should proactively redline and update their terms to close compliance gaps, clarify user rights, and strengthen third-party controls.

Are your privacy policies ready for a regulatory audit or class action lawsuit?
How confident are you in your third-party data processor agreements?
What steps can you take today to minimize legal and financial exposure?

This analysis is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For actual legal guidance, consult with a licensed attorney. This assessment is based on publicly available information and professional legal analysis. See erayaha.ai’s terms of service for liability limitations.