Source Support Services: Legal Risks & Compliance Gaps in Privacy Terms | Erayaha

Uncovering Hidden Legal Risks in Source Support Services’ Privacy Terms

When we examined Source Support Services’ privacy framework, our analysis revealed several critical legal and logical risks that could expose the company to substantial regulatory fines and litigation costs. For example, under the GDPR, non-compliance can result in penalties up to €20 million or 4% of annual global turnover. U.S. state laws like the CCPA also impose fines of $2,500–$7,500 per violation. In this case study, we highlight four key areas where the current terms fall short and propose actionable improvements to fortify legal enforceability and business protection.

1. Ambiguous Data Retention Language

The privacy statement states: “We will retain your personal information for as long as is necessary to fulfill the purpose for which it was collected unless a longer retention period is required to comply with legal obligations, resolve disputes, protect our assets, or enforce agreements.” This clause lacks specificity and fails to define clear retention periods or criteria, risking non-compliance with GDPR Article 5(1)(e), which mandates data minimization and storage limitation. Ambiguous retention policies can lead to regulatory scrutiny and costly investigations.

Legal Analysis

high Risk

Removed

Added

We will retain your personal information only for as long as isthe specific duration necessary to fulfill the purposepurposes for which it was collected, as detailed in this policy, unless a longer retention period is required to comply with legal obligations, resolve disputes, protect our assets, or enforce agreementsby law. Retention periods for each category of data will be documented and made available upon request.

Legal Explanation

The original clause is overly broad and does not specify retention periods or criteria, risking non-compliance with GDPR Article 5(1)(e). The revision provides clear limitations, aligns with regulatory requirements, and enhances transparency.

2. Incomplete Data Subject Rights Implementation

While the policy references EU/EEA data subject rights, it omits a clear, standardized process for handling requests, including verification, response timelines, and appeal mechanisms. This exposes Source to potential complaints and enforcement actions, as GDPR Articles 12–23 require transparent, documented procedures for data subject access, rectification, and erasure. Failure to comply can result in significant reputational and financial harm.

Legal Analysis

high Risk

Removed

Added

You canmay exercise your rights of access and request corrections, suppressionrectification, or deactivationserasure, restriction, objection, and data portability under applicable data protection laws directly with Source. If you need additional assistance, or help with accessing, correcting, suppressing, or deleting your personal information, please contactby submitting a request to privacy@sourcesupport.com. We make good faith efforts to honor reasonable requests to access, delete, update, suppress, or correct your data. WeSource will respond toverify your identity, document the request, and respond within 30 days. If we are unable to honor your request, we will provide you with anproviding a clear explanation for any denial and information on how to appeal.

Legal Explanation

The original clause lacks a standardized, transparent process for handling data subject requests, as required by GDPR Articles 12–23. The revision establishes clear procedures, timelines, and appeal mechanisms, reducing legal exposure.

3. Vague Third-Party Data Sharing Disclosures

The terms state that personal information may be shared with “strategic partners” and “service vendors,” but do not specify categories of recipients, purposes, or safeguards. Under GDPR Article 13(1)(e) and CCPA §1798.110, organizations must provide granular disclosures about third-party sharing. Insufficient transparency increases the risk of regulatory penalties and class action lawsuits, with settlements in similar cases reaching millions of dollars.

Legal Analysis

high Risk

Removed

Added

We make certaindisclose personal information available to strategic partners that work with us to provide our products and services or help us market to customers. Personal information will only be shared by us with these companies in order to provide or improve our products, services, and advertising; it will not be shared withclearly defined categories of third parties (e.g., payment processors, IT service providers) for their own marketingspecified purposes without, as detailed in this policy. We provide information on the safeguards in place and obtain your prior expressexplicit consent where required by law.

Legal Explanation

The original clause is vague about recipient categories, purposes, and safeguards, risking non-compliance with GDPR Article 13(1)(e) and CCPA. The revision increases transparency and legal defensibility.

4. Unilateral Privacy Policy Updates Without Explicit Notice

The privacy statement allows Source to update terms at any time, requiring users only to “visit these pages every now and then.” This approach lacks explicit notice and consent for material changes, undermining user trust and potentially violating GDPR Article 12 and consumer protection laws. Companies have faced enforcement actions and settlements exceeding $1 million for similar practices.

Legal Analysis

high Risk

Removed

Added

We may update this Privacy Statement from time to time. If we modify our Privacy Statement, we will post the revised version here, with an updated revision date. You agreeprovide explicit notice to visit these pages every now and then to be awareusers of and review any such revisions. If we make material changes to ourthis Privacy Statement, we may also notify you by other means prior to the changes taking effectincluding direct email notification where feasible, such asand obtain renewed consent where required by posting a notice on our websites or sending you a notificationlaw. By continuing toContinued use of our websiteservices after such revisions are in effect, you accept and agree tonotice constitutes acceptance of the revisions and to abide by themrevised terms.

Legal Explanation

The original clause places the burden on users to monitor changes and does not require explicit notice or consent for material updates, risking non-compliance with GDPR Article 12 and consumer protection laws. The revision ensures users are properly informed and consent is obtained as needed.

---

Conclusion: Proactive Legal Risk Management is Essential

Our analysis demonstrates that ambiguous retention policies, incomplete rights processes, vague third-party disclosures, and unilateral updates expose Source Support Services to significant regulatory and financial risks. Proactively addressing these issues not only ensures compliance but also builds customer trust and mitigates costly enforcement actions.

**Are your privacy terms exposing your business to hidden liabilities? How confident are you in your compliance with evolving global data regulations? What proactive steps can you take today to strengthen your legal framework?**

---

*This analysis is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For actual legal guidance, consult with a licensed attorney. This assessment is based on publicly available information and professional legal analysis. See erayaha.ai’s terms of service for liability limitations.*