KRW International Terms & Conditions: Critical Legal Risks and Compliance Gaps Revealed | Erayaha

When We Examined KRW International’s Terms & Conditions: Hidden Legal Risks with Real Financial Impact

Imagine a scenario where a single ambiguous privacy clause could expose your business to GDPR fines of up to €20 million, or where vague data usage terms could trigger costly litigation. Our analysis of KRW International’s Terms & Conditions reveals several high-impact legal and logical vulnerabilities that could result in significant financial and reputational damage if left unaddressed.

1. Ambiguity in Data Usage and Consent: GDPR Non-Compliance Risk

The T&C states: "Other data is collected automatically when visiting the website through our IT systems... These are technical data (e.g., Internet browser, operating system or time of the page request)." However, it does not specify the legal basis for such data collection, nor does it provide explicit mechanisms for obtaining user consent or informing users of their rights in accordance with GDPR Articles 6 and 7. This lack of clarity could lead to regulatory scrutiny and substantial fines.

Legal Analysis

critical Risk

Removed

Added

Other data is collected automatically when visiting the website through our IT systems. These are technical data (e.g.Such collection is conducted only with your explicit consent, Internet browseras required under GDPR Article 6, operating system or timeand you will be informed of the page request). The collection ofspecific purposes and legal basis for this information is automatic as soon as you enter our websiteprocessing prior to any data collection.

Legal Explanation

The original clause fails to specify the legal basis for data collection and does not obtain explicit user consent, exposing the company to GDPR non-compliance. The revision clarifies the lawful basis and ensures user consent, strengthening enforceability and regulatory alignment.

2. Incomplete Data Subject Rights Implementation

While the document references several data subject rights, it omits clear procedures for exercising these rights, such as timelines for response (GDPR Art. 12(3)) and contact details for the Data Protection Officer (DPO). Without these, users may be unable to effectively exercise their rights, and the company risks non-compliance penalties.

Legal Analysis

high Risk

Removed

Added

At any time youYou have the right to obtain free information about the origin, recipient, and purpose of your stored personal data. You also have a right, and to request the correction, blocking, or deletion of this data. For this purpose,Requests will be addressed within one month as well as for further questions aboutrequired by GDPR Article 12(3). For all data protection requests, you canmay contact usour designated Data Protection Officer at any time at the address given in the imprint[DPO contact details].

Legal Explanation

The original clause lacks a response timeframe and does not provide a Data Protection Officer contact, both required under GDPR. The revision ensures users can effectively exercise their rights and the company demonstrates compliance.

3. Inadequate Disclosure of Third-Party Data Transfers

The T&C references the use of Google Analytics and Google Web Fonts, which involve international data transfers, but fails to specify safeguards for cross-border transfers (GDPR Chapter V). This omission creates exposure to regulatory action and potential suspension of data flows, impacting business continuity and incurring remediation costs.

Legal Analysis

high Risk

Removed

Added

Google Analytics uses so-called “cookies”. These are text files that are stored on your computer and that allow an analysis of the use of the to analyze website by youusage. The informationData generated by the cookie about your use of this website is usually transmittedthese cookies may be transferred to a Google serverand processed in countries outside the EEA, including the USA and stored there. Such transfers will only occur with appropriate safeguards in place, such as Standard Contractual Clauses or an adequacy decision, as required by GDPR Chapter V.

Legal Explanation

The original clause omits the legal safeguards for international data transfers, a key GDPR requirement. The revision specifies compliance measures, reducing the risk of regulatory action and ensuring lawful cross-border data flows.

4. Insufficient Limitation of Liability for Data Breaches

The current language only generally warns of possible security gaps in internet communications but does not limit liability or clarify obligations in the event of a data breach. Without a clear limitation of liability clause, the company could face unlimited damages in civil litigation following a breach, with average breach costs exceeding $4.45 million (IBM 2023 report).

Legal Analysis

high Risk

Removed

Added

We point out that theWhile we implement industry-standard security measures, we cannot guarantee absolute security of data transmission intransmitted via the Internet (eg in the communication by E-Mail) can exhibit security gaps. A complete protectionExcept in cases of the datagross negligence or willful misconduct, our liability for damages resulting from unauthorized access by third partiesor data breaches is limited to the amount of direct damages proven, and does not possibleextend to indirect or consequential losses.

Legal Explanation

The original clause warns of security risks but does not limit liability, leaving the company exposed to unlimited damages. The revision introduces a standard limitation of liability, reducing financial exposure while maintaining accountability for gross negligence.

---

Conclusion: Proactive Legal Protection is Essential

Our examination reveals that KRW International’s Terms & Conditions contain critical gaps that could expose the company to regulatory fines, litigation, and operational disruption. Addressing these issues with precise legal language and robust compliance mechanisms is not just best practice—it’s essential risk management.

Are your terms and conditions truly protecting your business from today’s regulatory and litigation risks?
How much could a single ambiguous clause cost your company in fines or lost trust?
What proactive steps can you take to ensure airtight compliance and enforceability?

**This analysis is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For actual legal guidance, consult with a licensed attorney. This assessment is based on publicly available information and professional legal analysis. See erayaha.ai’s terms of service for liability limitations.**