Gislen Software Terms & Conditions: Key Legal Risks and Redline Solutions | Erayaha

When We Examined Gislen Software’s Terms & Conditions: What’s at Stake?

Imagine a scenario where a single ambiguous privacy clause exposes a company to GDPR fines of up to €20 million, or where unclear data retention rules lead to costly litigation. Our analysis of Gislen Software’s publicly available Terms & Conditions uncovers several high-impact legal and logical risks that could result in significant financial and reputational damage if left unaddressed.

1. Ambiguous Purpose Limitation for Personal Data Collection

The privacy policy states that personal data is collected for business purposes but lacks specificity regarding the exact purposes and legal bases for processing. This ambiguity can trigger GDPR non-compliance, risking regulatory penalties and loss of user trust.

Legal Analysis

high Risk

Removed

Added

We storecollect and process personal data about website visitors using cookies and IP addressessolely for the specific purposes detailed in this policy, in accordance with applicable privacy laws including GDPR. Some are from third-party providers such as GoogleEach processing activity is based on a clearly defined legal basis (e.g., Facebookconsent, HubSpotlegitimate interest), Cloud Flare and HotJar. Data collected in this mannerdata is not used for tracking personal information but to understand which visitors we have, how visitors behave on our site, and to improve the user experience. We never look into personal data for any other purpose than what is required, as per our documented policies, and to conduct our business and relationships with our contacts, which is allowed according to the GDPRbeyond those explicitly stated herein.

Legal Explanation

The original clause is overly broad and lacks specificity about the purposes and legal bases for processing, which is required under GDPR Article 5(1)(b) and Article 6. The revision clarifies lawful purposes and legal bases, strengthening compliance and enforceability.

2. Insufficient Clarity on Data Retention and Deletion Rights

The terms allow for prolonged email retention based on business relationships but do not specify maximum retention periods or clear deletion procedures. This exposes the company to potential breaches of GDPR Article 5(1)(e) and similar regulations, risking fines and enforcement actions.

Legal Analysis

high Risk

Removed

Added

Emails and related personal data will generally be retained as long as requiredonly for the minimum period necessary to fulfill the purposes for which they were collected, and a few years after we last contacted youin accordance with applicable legal retention requirements. Since we have typically long-lasting relationshipsData subjects will be informed of maximum retention periods and provided with our clients, e-mails are often retained longer than other dataclear procedures for requesting deletion.

Legal Explanation

The original clause lacks defined retention periods and does not provide users with clear deletion rights, violating GDPR Article 5(1)(e). The revision introduces specific retention limits and user rights, reducing regulatory and litigation risk.

3. Unclear International Data Transfer Safeguards

Personal data is transferred and stored on servers in India, but the policy does not address the legal safeguards required for international transfers under GDPR (e.g., Standard Contractual Clauses). This omission could result in invalid data transfers and regulatory scrutiny.

Legal Analysis

critical Risk

Removed

Added

In these cases, we send personalPersonal data transferred outside the European Economic Area (EEA) will be subject to our mail server in India. Anyappropriate safeguards, such requests are stored on our server and mayas Standard Contractual Clauses or other lawful transfer mechanisms as required by GDPR Articles 44-49. Data subjects will be stored at HubSpotinformed of these safeguards. Our email servers are located in our office in India.

Legal Explanation

The original clause does not address GDPR requirements for international data transfers. The revision ensures lawful transfers and transparency, reducing risk of invalid transfers and enforcement action.

4. Vague User Consent Mechanisms for Data Processing

While users must check a box to accept the privacy policy, the terms do not clarify the scope of consent, nor do they address withdrawal or granular consent for different processing activities. This lack of clarity can undermine the enforceability of user consent and increase litigation risk.

Legal Analysis

medium Risk

Removed

Added

YouBefore submitting personal data, users are always presented with a checkbox where you have to accept our privacy policy before sending dataclear and specific consent form outlining each processing activity. Users may provide granular consent for distinct purposes and may withdraw consent at any time without detriment.

Legal Explanation

The original clause does not specify the scope of consent or withdrawal rights, which are required under GDPR Articles 7 and 13. The revision clarifies consent mechanisms, enhancing enforceability and user protection.

---

Key Takeaways & Business Implications

Regulatory fines (up to €20 million under GDPR)
Costly litigation and reputational damage
Invalid international data transfers and business disruption

**Proactive legal protection is essential.** Companies should regularly review and redline their terms to ensure clarity, compliance, and enforceability.

Are your privacy and data retention policies specific enough to withstand regulatory scrutiny?
Do your international data transfer practices meet current legal standards?
How often do you audit and update your user consent mechanisms?

---

*This analysis is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For actual legal guidance, consult with a licensed attorney. This assessment is based on publicly available information and professional legal analysis. See erayaha.ai’s terms of service for liability limitations.*