Oasis International School Kuala Lumpur: Key Legal Risks in Privacy Policy and Terms | Erayaha

When Privacy Policies Create Six-Figure Risks: A Legal Analysis of Oasis International School Kuala Lumpur

When we examined Oasis International School Kuala Lumpur’s privacy policy and terms, our analysis revealed several legal and logical gaps that could expose the school to significant regulatory fines, litigation costs, and reputational harm. For example, non-compliance with Malaysia’s Personal Data Protection Act (PDPA) or the EU’s GDPR can result in fines up to RM500,000 or €20 million, respectively. Below, we highlight four critical issues and provide actionable improvements to strengthen enforceability and compliance.

1. Ambiguous Data Retention and Deletion Practices The current policy does not specify how long personal data is retained or the procedures for deletion. This omission creates compliance gaps with PDPA and GDPR, both of which require clear retention and erasure policies. Without this, the school risks regulatory penalties and potential lawsuits from data subjects seeking erasure rights.

Legal Analysis

high Risk

Removed

Added

We do not collect anyretain personal information unless you voluntarily provide it by sending us e-mail, participating in a survey, or completing an on-line form. Personal information submitted will not be transferredonly for as long as necessary to any non-affiliated third parties unless otherwisefulfill the purposes stated at the time of collection, or as required by applicable law. When a user submits personally identifiableUpon request or when no longer needed, personal information it is used only forwill be securely deleted or anonymized in accordance with the purpose stated at the time of collectionPersonal Data Protection Act (PDPA) and GDPR requirements.

Legal Explanation

The original clause lacks any reference to data retention or deletion, which are mandatory under PDPA and GDPR. The revision introduces a clear retention and deletion policy, reducing regulatory and litigation risk.

2. Vague Third-Party Data Sharing Disclosure The clause "Personal information submitted will not be transferred to any non-affiliated third parties unless otherwise stated at the time of collection" is ambiguous. It lacks specificity about categories of third parties, legal basis for transfer, and cross-border data transfer safeguards—key requirements under PDPA and GDPR. This could lead to unauthorized disclosures and regulatory action.

Legal Analysis

high Risk

Removed

Added

Personal information submitted will notonly be transferred to any non-affiliated third parties unless otherwise statedas specifically disclosed at the time of collection, and only to categories of recipients who provide adequate data protection safeguards. Cross-border transfers will comply with PDPA and GDPR requirements, including obtaining explicit consent where necessary.

Legal Explanation

The original clause is vague about third-party transfers and lacks legal safeguards for cross-border data sharing. The revision adds specificity, legal basis, and compliance with international standards.

3. Inconsistent Consent Mechanisms for Minors The policy states that consent will be sought from the student and/or parent "depending on the circumstances and the student’s mental ability and maturity." This standard is subjective and lacks clear thresholds, risking improper consent collection and non-compliance with child data protection laws. Litigation or regulatory fines for mishandling minors’ data can exceed RM100,000 per incident.

Legal Analysis

critical Risk

Removed

Added

Where consent for the use and disclosure of personal information is required, the school will seekobtain verifiable parental or legal guardian consent fromfor all students under the appropriate person. In the caseage of a student’s personal information18, the school will seek the consentexcept where otherwise permitted by law. Consent from the student and/ or parent depending onalone will only be accepted if the circumstances and the student’s mental ability and maturity to understand the consequences of the proposed use and disclosure is at least 18 years old or as specifically permitted under applicable law.

Legal Explanation

The original clause is subjective and lacks clear legal thresholds for obtaining consent from minors. The revision establishes objective, enforceable standards aligned with child data protection laws.

4. Insufficient Security Breach Notification Procedures While the policy mentions encryption and secure environments, it does not address breach notification obligations. Under PDPA and global standards, organizations must notify authorities and affected individuals promptly in the event of a data breach. Failure to do so can result in severe fines and reputational loss.

Legal Analysis

high Risk

Removed

Added

This website takes every precaution to protect our users'In the event of a data breach involving personal information. Whenever users submit personal information (such as contact info or credit card info) via online forms, registration, or online purchase, upon submission that information is encrypted via the highest level of SSLschool will promptly notify affected individuals and relevant authorities in accordance with the Personal Data Protection Act (Secured Sockets LayerPDPA) availableand other applicable laws. Servers that store personally identifiable information are in a secure environmentThe notification will include the nature of the breach, affected data, and remedial actions taken. Under no circumstances are credit card numbers permanently stored on our website servers.

Legal Explanation

The original clause omits any breach notification obligations, which are required by PDPA and global best practices. The revision adds a clear, enforceable notification procedure.

Conclusion: Proactive Legal Protection is Essential Our analysis shows that Oasis International School Kuala Lumpur’s current privacy framework contains critical gaps that could result in substantial financial and legal exposure. Addressing these issues with clear, enforceable language and robust compliance mechanisms is essential to avoid regulatory penalties and protect stakeholder trust.

**Are your organization’s privacy practices up to global standards? How would a major data breach impact your reputation and finances? What steps can you take today to proactively manage legal risk?**

---

*This analysis is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For actual legal guidance, consult with a licensed attorney. This assessment is based on publicly available information and professional legal analysis. See erayaha.ai’s terms of service for liability limitations.*