Fund for the Public Interest: Uncovering Legal Risks in Interview Notices Terms & Conditions | Erayaha

When We Examined Fund for the Public Interest’s Terms: Four Legal Risks That Could Cost Millions

Imagine a scenario where a candidate’s personal information is mishandled, or a dispute escalates to a class action—potentially exposing Fund for the Public Interest to fines exceeding $2 million under privacy regulations or to uncapped damages in court. Our analysis of the Fund’s Interview Notices Terms & Conditions reveals four critical legal and logical risks that could undermine enforceability and expose the organization to significant financial and reputational harm.

1. Ambiguous Consent for Data Usage The Terms allow the Fund to contact users via voice or text, including with autodialers, and to transfer consent to third parties. However, the language lacks specificity regarding the scope, duration, and legal basis for data processing. This ambiguity could violate the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) and privacy laws like the CCPA and GDPR, which require clear, informed consent and explicit opt-out mechanisms. Regulatory fines for non-compliance can reach $1,500 per violation under the TCPA and up to €20 million or 4% of annual revenue under the GDPR.

Legal Analysis

high Risk

Removed

Added

By providing your contact info to usinformation and indicating that you wishopting in to receive information from us via text message, you understand and agree that you are consentingexpressly consent to be contacted via voice and/or text using an autodialer or other means in regard to any content relevant to, solely for the Services or other similar information we think will be helpful to youpurposes described in connectionthese Terms and in accordance with potential or current employment withapplicable laws, including the FundTCPA, CCPA, and GDPR. YourYou may revoke your consent to be contactedat any time by following the opt-out instructions provided in each message. Consent will automaticallynot be transferred to any entity provided similar services so that you may continue to receive the Servicesthird party without your explicit, unless you have previously revoked the consent granted under this sectionwritten authorization.

Legal Explanation

The original clause is overly broad and lacks specificity regarding the scope, duration, and legal basis for consent. It also permits automatic transfer of consent, which may violate privacy and consumer protection laws. The revision clarifies the legal basis, limits consent to the described purposes, and requires explicit opt-out and transfer mechanisms, reducing regulatory risk.

2. Overbroad Limitation of Liability The Fund’s liability is capped at $100 for all direct damages, regardless of the nature or cause of harm. This blanket limitation may be deemed unconscionable or unenforceable, especially in cases involving gross negligence, willful misconduct, or statutory violations. Courts have invalidated similar clauses, resulting in multi-million-dollar judgments against organizations. The lack of carve-outs for statutory damages or data breaches amplifies this risk.

Legal Analysis

critical Risk

Removed

Added

Except as expressly provided in these Terms, under no circumstances and under no legal theory, whether in tort, contract, or otherwise, will the Fund be liable to you for any direct damages, costs, or liabilities in excess of $100, except in cases of gross negligence, willful misconduct, or statutory violations, including but not limited to data privacy breaches or violations of consumer protection laws, where such limitations are prohibited by law.

Legal Explanation

The original limitation of liability is overly broad and may be unenforceable in cases of gross negligence, willful misconduct, or statutory violations. The revision introduces carve-outs for these exceptions, aligning with legal standards and reducing the risk of the clause being invalidated in court.

3. Unilateral Amendment of Terms The Fund reserves the right to revise the Terms at any time, with changes effective upon notice or simply by updating the effective date. This one-sided amendment mechanism may render the agreement illusory and unenforceable, as courts require mutual assent and reasonable notice for material changes. Failure to provide explicit opt-in for significant amendments could expose the Fund to contract disputes and regulatory scrutiny.

Legal Analysis

high Risk

Removed

Added

We may revise these Terms from time to time. If we doFor any material changes, those revised Terms will supersede prior versions. Unless we say otherwise, revisions will be effective upon the effective date indicated at the top of these Terms. We will provide you with at least thirty (30) days’ advance notice of any material revisions. This notice will be provided via the contact information we have on file and obtain your explicit consent before such changes become effective. For other revisions, weNon-material changes will updatebe communicated by updating the effective date of these Terms at the top of the page. We encourage you to check the effective date of these Terms whenever you visit the Fund’s website. Your continued access orContinued use of the Services constitutes yourafter material changes without explicit consent will not constitute acceptance of any revisions. If you don't agree to the revisions, you should stop using the Services and we are not obligated to provide you with the Services.

Legal Explanation

The original clause allows unilateral amendment with implied acceptance, which may render the agreement unenforceable. The revision requires explicit consent for material changes, ensuring mutual assent and compliance with contract law standards.

4. Restrictive Arbitration and Class Action Waiver The arbitration provision mandates individual arbitration and prohibits class or collective actions. While such waivers are generally enforceable under the Federal Arbitration Act, recent court decisions have scrutinized overly restrictive arbitration clauses—especially where users lack meaningful opportunity to opt out or where the costs of arbitration deter legitimate claims. This could lead to the entire clause being struck down, exposing the Fund to class action litigation and associated costs, which can easily exceed $5 million in aggregate settlements.

Legal Analysis

high Risk

Removed

Added

All disputes subject to this agreement must be arbitrated as individual claims. Specifically, you agree that you may bring claims againstexcept where applicable law prohibits the Fund only in your individual capacity and not as a plaintiff or member in any purportedwaiver of class, representative, or collective proceedingactions. Similarly, you understand that we may only pursue claims against you in your individual capacity and not as a plaintiff or member in any purported class, representative, or collective proceeding. You waiveretain any right you may otherwise havenon-waivable rights to pursue, file, participate in, or be represented in actions brought in any court as a class, representative, or collective actionsproceedings as provided by law. This waiver applies to any claims covered by this agreement to the fullest extentarbitration provision does not preclude you from seeking public injunctive relief or other remedies that such a waiver is permitted bycannot be waived under applicable law.

Legal Explanation

The original clause imposes an absolute class action waiver, which may be unenforceable in certain jurisdictions or for specific statutory claims. The revision preserves non-waivable rights and clarifies the scope of the waiver, reducing the risk of the entire clause being invalidated.

---

Conclusion: Proactive Legal Protection Is Essential Our analysis highlights four preventable risks in the Fund for the Public Interest’s Terms & Conditions that could result in regulatory fines, unenforceable provisions, and costly litigation. Proactive redlining and legal review can mitigate these exposures, strengthen enforceability, and protect both the organization and its users.

How confident are you that your organization’s contracts would withstand regulatory scrutiny?
What would a multi-million-dollar class action mean for your mission and operations?
Are you taking the necessary steps to ensure enforceable, compliant agreements?

**This analysis is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For actual legal guidance, consult with a licensed attorney. This assessment is based on publicly available information and professional legal analysis. See erayaha.ai’s terms of service for liability limitations.**