Gwilliam Ivary Chiosso Cavalli & Brewer: Critical Legal Risks in Privacy Policy Exposed | Erayaha

When Privacy Policies Fall Short: A Case Study on Gwilliam Ivary Chiosso Cavalli & Brewer

Imagine facing a $2.5 million GDPR fine or a class-action lawsuit due to a single ambiguous clause in your privacy policy. Our analysis of Gwilliam Ivary Chiosso Cavalli & Brewer's online terms reveals several critical legal risks that could expose the firm to significant regulatory penalties and reputational harm.

1. Ambiguous Consent and Data Use Language The policy states that personal information may be collected and used "primarily to provide you with a personalized Internet experience" but lacks specificity regarding the legal basis for processing and fails to obtain explicit consent for sensitive data. This ambiguity could violate GDPR Article 6 and CCPA requirements, risking fines up to 4% of annual revenue or $7,500 per infraction in California.

Legal Analysis

high Risk

Removed

Added

We use thecollect and process personal information primarily to provide you with a personalized Internet experience that deliverssolely for the informationspecific purposes outlined in this policy, resources,in accordance with applicable privacy laws including GDPR and services that are most relevant and helpful to youCCPA. We don’t share any of theobtain explicit consent for processing sensitive information youand provide with others, unless we say so in this Privacy Policy, or when we believe in good faith that the law requires itclear notice of all intended uses.

Legal Explanation

The original clause is overly broad and lacks the specificity required by GDPR and CCPA for lawful processing. The revision establishes a clear legal basis, limits use to stated purposes, and ensures compliance with consent requirements.

2. Inadequate Limitation of Liability for Sensitive Information Users are told not to submit sensitive information, but the policy disclaims all liability if they do so. This blanket waiver is likely unenforceable and exposes the firm to negligence claims and potential damages exceeding $500,000 in the event of a data breach involving sensitive data.

Legal Analysis

high Risk

Removed

Added

Please do not submitWe strongly advise against submitting any confidential, proprietary or sensitive personally identifiable information (e.g. Social Security Number; date of birth; drivers license number; or credit card, bank account or other financial If such information) (collectively is submitted, “Sensitive Information”)we will take reasonable measures to protect it and comply with applicable data protection laws. If you submit any Sensitive InformationHowever, you do so at your own risk and we will not be liabledisclaim liability only to you or responsible for consequences of your submissionthe extent permitted by law.

Legal Explanation

A blanket waiver of liability for sensitive data is likely unenforceable and exposes the firm to negligence claims. The revision aligns with legal standards, limits liability appropriately, and reinforces data protection obligations.

3. Insufficient Disclosure of Third-Party Data Sharing The policy allows sharing with unaffiliated attorneys or firms without clear user consent or a defined process for safeguarding transferred data. This creates a compliance gap under both GDPR (Articles 13-14) and CCPA, risking regulatory scrutiny and possible litigation.

Legal Analysis

high Risk

Removed

Added

If we are unable to assist with your matter, but know an unaffiliated attorney or firm that may be able to help you, we may refer you andwill only share your information you provided us with unaffiliated attorneys or firms after obtaining your explicit consent and ensuring that party;appropriate data protection safeguards are in place.

Legal Explanation

Transferring personal data to third parties without clear user consent or safeguards violates GDPR and CCPA requirements. The revision ensures lawful transfer and protection of user data.

4. Lack of Commitment to Update Users on Policy Changes The policy states changes will be posted online but does not commit to notifying users directly. This omission could undermine enforceability and user trust, especially under GDPR's transparency requirements, and may result in disputes or complaints.

Legal Analysis

medium Risk

Removed

Added

If our information practices change in a significant way, we will postnotify affected users directly via email or other reasonable means, in addition to posting the policy changes hereonline.

Legal Explanation

Posting changes online alone does not meet GDPR transparency requirements. The revision ensures users are directly informed, supporting enforceability and user trust.

---

Key Takeaways and Business Implications Our examination shows that even well-intentioned privacy policies can harbor costly loopholes. Addressing these issues proactively can prevent regulatory fines, litigation costs, and reputational damage. Are your terms built to withstand regulatory scrutiny? How would your business handle a multi-million dollar privacy lawsuit? What steps can you take today to strengthen your legal framework?

*This analysis is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For actual legal guidance, consult with a licensed attorney. This assessment is based on publicly available information and professional legal analysis. See erayaha.ai's terms of service for liability limitations.*