Motion In Time logo
Motion In Time

Critical Legal Risks in Motion In Time's Terms & Conditions: A Professional Redline Analysis

Our expert review of Motion In Time's Terms & Conditions uncovers four high-impact legal risks, including liability loopholes and compliance gaps, with actionable solutions for enforceability.

When We Examined Motion In Time's Terms: Four Legal Risks That Could Cost Millions

Imagine a scenario where a single ambiguous clause in your Terms & Conditions exposes your business to a $2 million class action, or a regulatory fine of $500,000 for non-compliance. Our analysis of Motion In Time's legal framework reveals four critical issues that could lead to significant financial and reputational harm if left unaddressed.

1. Overbroad Limitation of Liability: Unenforceable in Many Jurisdictions Motion In Time's blanket exclusion of all indirect, special, punitive, incidental, and consequential damages—even in cases of negligence—creates a major enforceability risk. Courts in several U.S. states and EU jurisdictions routinely strike down such clauses, especially where consumer rights or gross negligence are involved. This exposes the company to unpredictable litigation costs, potentially exceeding $1 million per incident.

Legal Analysis
critical Risk
Removed
Added
IN NO EVENT SHALL Motion In Time OR ANY OF ITS AFFILIATED ENTITIES OR SUPPLIERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY INDIRECT, SPECIAL, PUNITIVE, INCIDENTAL, EXEMPLARY OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES, EVEN IF Motion In Time HAS BEEN PREVIOUSLY ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OFEXCEPT WHERE SUCH DAMAGES ARISE FROM GROSS NEGLIGENCE, WHETHER IN AN ACTIONWILLFUL MISCONDUCT, UNDER CONTRACT, NEGLIGENCE OR ANY OTHER THEORY, ARISING OUT OF ORWHERE SUCH LIMITATION IS PROHIBITED BY APPLICABLE LAW. NOTHING IN CONNECTION WITH THE USETHIS SECTION SHALL LIMIT LIABILITY FOR PERSONAL INJURY, INABILITY TO USE OR PERFORMANCE OF THE INFORMATIONFRAUD, SERVICES, PRODUCTS AND MATERIALS AVAILABLE FROM THE SITEOR STATUTORY CONSUMER RIGHTS. These limitations shall apply notwithstanding any failure of essential purpose or the existence of any limited remedy.

Legal Explanation

The original clause is overly broad and unenforceable in many jurisdictions, especially regarding gross negligence, willful misconduct, or statutory consumer rights. The revision narrows the limitation, aligns with legal standards, and reduces the risk of the entire clause being struck down in court.

2. Disclaimer of All Warranties: Potential Violation of Consumer Protection Laws The T&C disclaims all warranties, including merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose, to the maximum extent permitted by law. However, U.S. federal law (Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act) and state laws (e.g., NY GBL § 349) prohibit blanket disclaimers for consumer goods. Failure to provide minimum statutory warranties can trigger regulatory action and class actions, with penalties reaching $5,000 per violation plus treble damages.

Legal Analysis
high Risk
Removed
Added
TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, Motion In Time AND ITS SUPPLIERS DISCLAIM ALL REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, WITH RESPECT TO SUCH INFORMATIONEXCEPT FOR WARRANTIES THAT CANNOT BE LAWFULLY EXCLUDED UNDER APPLICABLE CONSUMER PROTECTION LAWS, SERVICES, PRODUCTS AND MATERIALS, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, TITLE, NON THE MAGNUSON-INFRINGEMENT, FREEDOM FROM COMPUTER VIRUSMOSS WARRANTY ACT AND IMPLIED WARRANTIES ARISING FROM COURSE OF DEALING OR COURSE OF PERFORMANCENEW YORK GENERAL BUSINESS LAW § 349.

Legal Explanation

The original clause attempts to disclaim all warranties, which is prohibited for consumer goods under federal and state law. The revision carves out non-waivable statutory warranties, ensuring compliance and reducing regulatory risk.

3. Ambiguous Account Liability: Shifting All Risk to Users The clause stating Motion In Time is not responsible for any loss or damage resulting from account misuse—even if caused by their own security failures—creates a significant loophole. If a data breach occurs due to inadequate security, the company could face liability for customer losses, including statutory damages under the NY SHIELD Act and similar laws, potentially $250,000+ per breach.

Legal Analysis
high Risk
Removed
Added
Motion In Time shall not be responsible or liable, directly or indirectly, in any way for any loss or damage of any kind incurred as a result of, or in connection with, your failure to comply with this section, except where such loss or damage results from Motion In Time’s own negligence, security failure, or breach of the Terms of Useapplicable data protection laws.

Legal Explanation

The original clause shifts all risk to users, even in cases where the company is at fault. The revision clarifies that the company remains liable for its own negligence or security failures, aligning with statutory obligations and fair allocation of risk.

4. Lack of Data Privacy Commitments: No Reference to GDPR/CCPA Compliance The T&C is silent on how personal data is collected, used, or protected, and lacks any reference to GDPR, CCPA, or other privacy regulations. This omission is a critical compliance gap, exposing the company to regulatory fines up to €20 million (GDPR) or $7,500 per CCPA violation.

Legal Analysis
critical Risk
Removed
Added
[No clause addressingMotion In Time will collect, use, and protect personal information in accordance with applicable data privacy laws, including but not limited to the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA). Details of data collection, or regulatory compliance]processing, and user rights are set forth in our Privacy Policy.

Legal Explanation

The absence of a data privacy clause is a critical compliance gap. The revision introduces a clear commitment to privacy law compliance, reducing regulatory exposure and building user trust.

---

Conclusion: Proactive Legal Protection is Essential

Our review demonstrates that even well-established companies like Motion In Time can face substantial legal and financial risks from outdated or incomplete Terms & Conditions. Addressing these issues proactively can prevent costly litigation, regulatory penalties, and reputational damage.

**Are your contracts exposing your business to unnecessary risk? How often do you review your T&C for compliance gaps? What would a single lawsuit cost your organization?**

*This analysis is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For actual legal guidance, consult with a licensed attorney. This assessment is based on publicly available information and professional legal analysis. See erayaha.ai's terms of service for liability limitations.*