Fraser Stryker PC LLO: Key Legal Risks in Website Terms & Conditions—A Case Study | Erayaha

When Cookie Consent Goes Wrong: The Hidden Costs in Fraser Stryker PC LLO’s Website Terms

Imagine a scenario where a single privacy misstep could cost a law firm up to €20 million under GDPR, or expose it to class-action lawsuits in California. Our analysis of Fraser Stryker PC LLO’s website terms reveals several critical legal and logical risks that, if left unaddressed, could result in substantial regulatory penalties and reputational harm.

1. Ambiguous Cookie Consent Language Fraser Stryker’s cookie consent mechanism states: "By clicking 'Accept All', you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit 'Cookie Settings' to provide a controlled consent." This language lacks specificity regarding the categories of cookies, their purposes, and the legal basis for processing, falling short of GDPR and CCPA requirements. Such ambiguity can lead to regulatory fines and user mistrust.

Legal Analysis

high Risk

Removed

Added

By clicking “'Accept All”', you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However as described in our Cookie Policy, youwhich details each category of cookies, their purposes, and the legal basis for processing. You may visit "adjust your preferences at any time in 'Cookie Settings" to provide a controlled consent'.

Legal Explanation

The original clause is overly broad and does not specify the categories, purposes, or legal basis for cookie use, as required by GDPR and CCPA. The revised clause provides clarity, transparency, and a reference to a detailed policy, supporting informed consent and regulatory compliance.

2. Insufficient Disclosure of Third-Party Data Sharing The terms mention third-party cookies but do not specify which third parties receive user data, nor the purposes for which data is shared. Under GDPR and CCPA, failure to disclose recipients and processing purposes can result in fines up to 4% of annual global turnover or $7,500 per violation in California.

Legal Analysis

high Risk

Removed

Added

We also use third-party cookies that help us analyzefrom specified providers (listed in our Cookie Policy) for analytics and understand how you use this websitefunctionality purposes. These cookies willYour data may be stored in your browsershared with these providers only with your explicit consent, and you may review the list of third parties and their privacy policies at any time.

Legal Explanation

The original clause fails to identify third parties or specify data sharing purposes, violating GDPR Article 13 and CCPA disclosure requirements. The revision ensures transparency and enables users to make informed decisions about data sharing.

3. Lack of Explicit User Rights Statement There is no clear statement informing users of their rights to access, correct, delete, or restrict processing of their personal data. This omission creates compliance gaps with GDPR Articles 12-23 and CCPA Sections 1798.100-1798.199, increasing litigation and enforcement risk.

Legal Analysis

high Risk

Removed

Added

No explicit statementYou have the right to access, correct, delete, or restrict processing of user rights regardingyour personal data is, and to object to certain uses, as provided by applicable law. Please refer to our Privacy Policy for instructions on exercising your rights.

Legal Explanation

Omitting a user rights statement creates compliance gaps with GDPR Articles 12-23 and CCPA. The revision informs users of their rights and directs them to further information, reducing litigation risk.

4. Unclear Opt-Out Mechanism for Non-Essential Cookies While the terms allow users to opt out via "Cookie Settings," the process and consequences are not clearly explained. Without a transparent opt-out mechanism, the firm risks non-compliance with ePrivacy Directive and CCPA, potentially resulting in regulatory action and user complaints.

Legal Analysis

medium Risk

Removed

Added

You also have the option tomay opt -out of thesenon-essential cookies at any time via 'Cookie Settings. But opting' Essential cookies necessary for website functionality cannot be disabled. Opting out of some of thesenon-essential cookies maywill not affect your browsing experienceaccess to core site features.

Legal Explanation

The original clause is vague about which cookies can be opted out of and the consequences. The revision clarifies the opt-out process and distinguishes between essential and non-essential cookies, supporting compliance with ePrivacy Directive and CCPA.

Conclusion: Proactive Legal Protection is Essential Our examination shows that even well-intentioned privacy notices can create substantial legal exposure if not drafted with precision. The issues identified here could expose Fraser Stryker PC LLO to regulatory fines exceeding €20 million under GDPR or significant class-action liability in the U.S. Proactive redrafting and compliance review are essential to mitigate these risks.

**This analysis is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For actual legal guidance, consult with a licensed attorney. This assessment is based on publicly available information and professional legal analysis. See erayaha.ai’s terms of service for liability limitations.**

**Are your website terms keeping pace with evolving privacy laws? What would a regulatory audit reveal about your compliance posture? How much risk can your business afford to take?**