DaySpring Cards: Critical Legal Risks Hidden in Privacy Policy & Terms | Erayaha

When We Examined DaySpring Cards’ Legal Framework: Four Risks That Could Cost Millions

Imagine a scenario where a privacy regulator fines DaySpring Cards up to $10 million for ambiguous data-sharing practices, or a class action lawsuit emerges from unclear consumer consent. Our analysis of DaySpring Cards’ Terms & Conditions reveals four critical legal and logical errors that could expose the company to substantial financial and reputational harm.

1. Ambiguous Consent for Data Collection and Use DaySpring’s policy states that by accessing the site, users agree to the terms and privacy policy. However, it does not specify the legal basis for processing personal data (such as consent, contract, or legitimate interest), nor does it provide granular options for users to control how their data is used. This ambiguity risks non-compliance with GDPR and CCPA, where explicit, informed consent is required for certain types of data processing. Regulatory fines for such violations can reach €20 million or 4% of annual turnover under GDPR.

Legal Analysis

high Risk

Removed

Added

By Accessingaccessing or using our Sites or Services, you agreeacknowledge and, where required by law, expressly consent to the Terms of Usecollection, use, and processing of your personal information as described in this Policy. Where applicable law requires, we will obtain your explicit consent for specific types of data processing (e.g., sensitive personal information, targeted advertising, or international transfers), and you will be provided with clear choices to manage your preferences.

Legal Explanation

The original clause is overly broad and does not specify the legal basis for processing personal data or provide for explicit, informed consent as required by GDPR and CCPA. The revision clarifies the consent mechanism and ensures compliance with privacy regulations, reducing legal ambiguity and enforcement risk.

2. Overbroad Third-Party Data Sharing and Selling The policy allows DaySpring to disclose personal information to third parties for purposes that may constitute a “sale” or “sharing” under privacy laws, but it lacks specificity about which data is shared, with whom, and for what purposes. This overbroad language increases the risk of regulatory scrutiny and class action litigation, especially in California, where CCPA/CPRA require detailed disclosures and opt-out mechanisms. Settlements in similar cases have exceeded $5 million.

Legal Analysis

critical Risk

Removed

Added

We may disclose personal information to third parties in situations that qualifyonly as a “sale” or “sharing” (for targeted advertising purposes) underspecifically described in this Policy and in compliance with applicable privacy laws. Categories of third parties We will provide a clear, up-to whom we may sell or share-date list of categories of personal information include affiliatesshared, independent Hallmark retailersthe specific third parties involved, sports leagues and organizations, other retailersthe purposes for such sharing or sellers of consumer goods or services, and advertising, social media, and analytics companiesselling. These third parties may Users will be given a conspicuous, easy-to-use yourmechanism to opt out of the sale or sharing of their personal information for their everyday business purposesat any time, including marketingas required by law.

Legal Explanation

The original clause is vague and overbroad, lacking specificity about what data is shared, with whom, and for what purposes. The revision ensures compliance with CCPA/CPRA by requiring detailed disclosures and opt-out rights, reducing litigation and regulatory risk.

3. Insufficient Safeguards for International Data Transfers DaySpring notifies users that their data may be processed and stored in the U.S. or other countries with less protective privacy laws, but does not specify what safeguards (such as Standard Contractual Clauses or adequacy decisions) are in place. This omission creates a compliance gap with GDPR and other international frameworks, risking data transfer bans or fines.

Legal Analysis

high Risk

Removed

Added

By using our Sites and/or Services, or otherwise providing us with any information, you agreeacknowledge that we may process and store your personal information may be transferred to and processed in the United States and in other jurisdictions. Where required by law (such as under GDPR), we will implement appropriate safeguards for which the privacy laws may not be as comprehensive as those in the country where you reside and/or are a citizen. As a resultinternational data transfers, this information may be subject to access requests from governmentsincluding Standard Contractual Clauses, courtsadequacy decisions, or law enforcement in the United States and other countries according to the laws in those jurisdictionslawful mechanisms, and will provide you with information about these safeguards upon request.

Legal Explanation

The original clause fails to specify what legal safeguards are in place for international data transfers, creating a compliance gap with GDPR and similar frameworks. The revision addresses this by committing to recognized transfer mechanisms, reducing the risk of enforcement actions or transfer bans.

4. Unilateral Policy Changes Without Adequate Notice or Consent The policy allows DaySpring to update the Privacy Policy at any time, with continued use constituting acceptance. However, it does not require affirmative user consent for material changes, nor does it guarantee sufficient advance notice. This exposes DaySpring to challenges of enforceability and potential consumer protection violations, with litigation costs easily surpassing $1 million in the event of a dispute.

Legal Analysis

medium Risk

Removed

Added

We may update this Privacy Policy from time to time. If we makeFor material changes to the Policythat affect your rights or obligations, we will update the effective date and provide notice through the Sites or using contact information you providedwith advance notice and, where required by law, obtain your affirmative consent before such changes take effect. Your continued use of the Sites or Services after the effective datefollowing non-material changes will constitute acceptance of the revised Privacy Policy constitutes your consent to those changes. We may provide you with the ability to opt-in or opt-out of certain changes, as required by law.

Legal Explanation

The original clause allows unilateral changes without requiring affirmative user consent for material updates, which may be unenforceable and violate consumer protection laws. The revision ensures users are adequately informed and, where necessary, have provided explicit consent, strengthening enforceability and reducing litigation risk.

---

Conclusion: Proactive Legal Protection is Essential Our analysis reveals that DaySpring Cards faces significant legal exposure due to ambiguous consent, overbroad data sharing, inadequate international safeguards, and weak change notification procedures. Addressing these issues is not just about compliance—it’s about protecting business value and consumer trust.

**Are your contracts exposing you to hidden regulatory risks? How would a multimillion-dollar fine impact your business? What proactive steps can you take to bulletproof your legal framework?**

---

*This analysis is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For actual legal guidance, consult with a licensed attorney. This assessment is based on publicly available information and professional legal analysis. See erayaha.ai’s terms of service for liability limitations.*